Zelandakh Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 That works, too. This is more about the specific range, it's the same as the usual 15-17 1NT.The ranges I know are approximately 12-13, 14-15 and 16+. Are you playing 12-14/15-17/18+? I want to bid 4M over 2NT as little as possible so making it the most common answer from these 3 just makes no sense to me. There's a mnemonic for Truscott defense to strong club. There are two bids that show non-touching suits: Double and 1NT. 1NT shows the pointed suits because 1 has a point at the top.That is another interesting idea. I learnt that you double when you hold the suit bid and bid 1NT when you hold the other pair. So (1♣) - X = ♣ + ♥. (1♣) - 1NT = ♦ + ♠. (1♣) - (1♦) - X = ♦ + ♠. (1♣) - (1♦) - 1NT = ♣ + ♥. Of course the best-known mnemonic in this area is CRASH, which typically translates either to X = same colour; 1♦ = same rank; 1NT = same shape, or to X = ♥; 1♦ = ♠; 1♥ = same colour; 1♠ = same rank; 1NT = same shape Busy (in two suits)Loser (count rectified)U - I think under? The defender must be under at least 1 menace? (no, googled it again, it is upper)Entry (to the menace)The U is Upper I believe, though Under is arguably more descriptive of what it actually means - at least one of the threats needs to be in the hand playing immediately after the hand being squeezed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 (bf added by me here)Busy (in two suits)Loser (count rectified)U - I think under? The defender must be under at least 1 menace? (no, googled it again, it is upper)Entry (to the menace)The U is Upper I believe, though Under is arguably more descriptive of what it actually means - at least one of the threats needs to be in the hand playing immediately after the hand being squeezed. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: Yes, I have always found this unhelpful. I know that I need a squeeze card, menaces, entries and timing ... but none of these helpful words seems to relate to BLUE!I think the most likely etymology is Blue Monday. Squeezes never work, just like nothing works on Mondays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 I think the most likely etymology is Blue Monday. Squeezes never work, just like nothing works on Mondays.Or alternatively, players trying to visualise using the BLUE acronym pull off a squeeze once in a blue moon. :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfi Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 Of course the best-known mnemonic in this area is CRASH.A similar mnemonic is CRO (colour-rank-other). Of course, I've always wanted to play variations of this just for amusement value, including: SHARC (maybe SHREC with a bit of imagination), ORC, OCHRE, ROC and so on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterAlan Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 That is another interesting idea. I learnt that you double when you hold the suit bid and bid 1NT when you hold the other pair.That's how I remember it, and you don't have to change the X / 1NT mnemonic if you play correspondingly over 1♦. If you play Helvic over 1NT(X), as my regular partner and I do, then Truscott has the same pattern for the touching two-suiters (the suit + next up), which also eases memory strain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 Or alternatively, players trying to visualise using the BLUE acronym pull of a squeeze once in a blue moon. :lol: It was a decent book though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 Or alternatively, players trying to visualise using the BLUE acronym pull of a squeeze once in a blue moon. :lol:Or alternatively, say "oops, sorry for misreading your post. Obviously you explained what 'U' stood for but I was too busy trying to educate you to notice that you actually said 'upper' in your post. Oh well!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FelicityR Posted January 30, 2020 Report Share Posted January 30, 2020 A maxim: The less you have to remember, the less you have to forget (Just came to me while reading this thread.) But in all seriousness, asking your (regular) partner questions (and your partner doing likewise to you) about your system, conventions and gadgets away from the table in a Q&A session as an aide-memoire works well I find. Your partner telling you what a particular bid means when you've forgotten it, or vice versa, does seem to lock it in the memory better. The only problem comes when both of you have forgotten what a specific bid meant then it's "oh dear". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.