Dinarius Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 [hv=pc=n&s=s2hakqj87dak7ct75&n=sa65ht62d65caq862]133|200[/hv] You are in 6♥. West leads Q♦ You draw trumps in two and ruff a ♦ So, you have 11 tricks. What is the best way to play the ♣ suit to guarantee the second ♣ trick that you need? Finesse? Or A♣ and return to hand and play towards Q♣? Thanks. D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FelicityR Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 I would do an elimination in ♦s and ♠s before committing to the ♣suit. My philosophy here is simple: If you finesse ♣s immediately you only see one card from an opponent; if you cash the ♣A and then come back to hand to hand to lead towards the ♣Q you will see three cards from the opponents before you have to make a decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masse24 Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 Low from hand toward dummy, intending to duck if west plays low. Otherwise, if west covers your 5 or 7, you cover as cheaply as possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 [hv=pc=n&s=s2hakqj87dak7ct75&n=sa65ht62d65caq862]133|200|Dinarius asks 'You are in 6♥.West leads Q♦. You draw trumps in two and ruff a ♦, So, you have 11 tricks.What is the best way to play the ♣ suit to guarantee the second ♣ trick that you need?1. Finesse? Or 2. A♣ and return to hand and play towards Q♣?'++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Line 1 makes an overtrick when LHO has doubleton ♣KJ. Line 2 gains when RHO has singleton ♣K.[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnu Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 [hv=pc=n&s=s2hakqj87dak7ct75&n=sa65ht62d65caq862]133|200|Dinarius asks 'You are in 6♥.West leads Q♦. You draw trumps in two and ruff a ♦, So, you have 11 tricks.What is the best way to play the ♣ suit to guarantee the second ♣ trick that you need?1. Finesse? Or 2. A♣ and return to hand and play towards Q♣?'++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Line 2 gains when RHO has singleton ♣K.[/hv]Line 2 also gains when RHO has ♣KJ and when LHO has ♣Jx (J9 is also handled by line 1) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smerriman Posted November 20, 2019 Report Share Posted November 20, 2019 Line 2 also gains when RHO has ♣KJ and when LHO has ♣Jx (J9 is also handled by line 1)Doesn't line 1 work in both those cases? If you finesse first, the jack drops under the ace at trick 2. But masse24's line looks very promising. Edit - I think I see what you mean; you were comparing to that line, not the same line as nige1 (was confused by your quote about singleton K, which both these lines pick up). So you're right, A then leading towards the Q loses to J9x, but gains for Jx and 9xx, so is better than the triple finesse after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve2005 Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 Line 2 also gains when RHO has ♣KJ and when LHO has ♣Jx (J9 is also handled by line 1)Line 2 is better. whenever line 1 would work line 2 works and it has other hands where only line 2 works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pescetom Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 Does anyone have percentages for lines 1, 2 and 3(=Masse24) ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Tu Posted November 21, 2019 Report Share Posted November 21, 2019 Line 2 is clearly better than line 1. Picking up stiff K offside. 69.22%Line 2 is better than line 3 (deep finesse). Basically line 3 > line 2 if J9x onside. But line 2 > line 3 if K9x offside or KJ offside. So net worse by the KJ offside combination, 3.39% worse. Deep finesse would be better at MP if one felt that a very large percentage of the field would find 6 (since you can take all the tricks more often), but I think that is clearly not the case on this pair of hands, so I would try to just make 6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts