3rd hand 2S

[barmar]

Violating an agreement is not an infraction of law.

Unless you do it too often, because then your actual style becomes an implicit agreement, and explaining it with your explicit agreement is MI.

 

I suppose you'll say that this is a different infraction, but they're tied together.

[blackshoe]

Violating an agreement is not an infraction of law.

 

Unless you do it too often, because then your actual style becomes an implicit agreement, and explaining it with your explicit agreement is MI.

 

I suppose you'll say that this is a different infraction, but they're tied together.

Well, it's not the putative infraction I envisioned when I said that. In fact, if the bid falls under your implicit agreement, it is a different infraction, and one of law rather than regulation. Frankly, even if I'm stuck with the regulation in question, or perhaps especially if I am, I would be happier if I were able to rule a violation of the disclosure laws.