Jump to content

after strong hand sets suit


Recommended Posts

After such an auction as

 

2C-strong

2H-double negative

3S-forcing, sets suit

 

what are we looking for here? I think most who play a 2H DN use it to deny 2 queens or a king. Are we looking for partner to cue a queen now? I would think we would want to know shape information, especially trump support and ruffing ability. Interested if anyone has thought this through.

 

I'm actually more interested in applying this to IMprecision.

 

1C-strong

1D-0-4 or 9+ (approximately)

1S-natural, forcing

2C-0-4, club tolerance

3S-sets trump, f

 

Assuming I have this right, responder could have as much as an ace so cue bidding would make a lot more sense here. However, I'm still thinking trump support and distribution in general are important. Maybe

 

no fit, bad

no fit, good

fit, bad

fit, good

 

Must be something better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 - 1 - 1M (4+ forcing) - ?

 

For many years I have used the Johnson-Berkowitz-Cohen scheme:

 

https://web.archive....lub/bc_jb1c.txt

 

Which focuses on major suit fits and strength:

 

1/1NT = dbl negative w/wo 4+ 0-4 hcp (no ace)

2 = 5-7 hcp and 0-2 cd support for the major

2 = 5-7 and exactly 3-cd support for the major

2M = 4-cd support 3-5 hcp

2oM = 5-cds 5-7

3Y = Mini-Splinter or FIt-Jump (your choice)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a good scheme. Using that, how would you continue after 1C-1D, 1S-1N, 3S? assuming that 3S is forcing and sets trump.

i have used various schemes after responder shows a dbl negative to 1M.

 

A jump (after a dbl negative) sets trumps and asks for cue bidding: Responder bids 3NT with an outside K, shows an outside A or raises trump with neither. One may want to include shortage in the responses ...

 

1 - 1 - 2M is used to ask for support when the suit is not semi-solid or better (updated Precision Support Ask):

1st step = 0-1 cds,

2nd step = exactly 2-cd support,

3rd step = 3+ cd support and 0-1 Control,

4th step = 3+ cd support and 2 controls,

5th step and up: zoom to controls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was thinking almost precisely that same scheme, but using QPs

 

I haven't used QPs in some time, I wonder if QPs would be better if opener is balanced? Log ago in Houston, we played Spiral Scan and that covered Qs occasionally if the bidding went on long enough. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...