Jump to content

Underbidding weak two rebid


rmcubed56

Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&s=sat32hak82d73ca32&w=s85hq6daj8ckj8764&n=skqj976h9dqt94cqt&e=s4hjt7543dk652c95&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=2sp2np3sppp]399|300[/hv]

 

North is so strong that personally I would open it 1S especially if Drury is available. When opened as a weak two however i responded with 2N force which GIB sees as artificial 15-point+ forcing.

 

GIB then makes a minimum bid of 3S which it says is 7-9 total points. Why? It clearly has a much stronger hand. Maybe it thinks we will end in no trumps and discounts points for doubleton and singleton? But it seems to score nothing for the Q either... anyway game was a sure thing. Next time I shall assume GIB can’t handle 2N with trump support and just jump straight to 4S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, you might have just bid 4S holding four covers and a ruffing value. Partner's weak two should be decent vul vs not in 1st (not sure if GiB understands the nuances of seat and vulnerability though), so even opposite a minimum, 4S should have play.

 

But you are certainly right that the hand is far too good for a weak two opener. 6-4 shape, a great suit and a ton of intermediate cards. I would open 1S every day of the week, and twice on Sundays.

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

North is so strong that personally I would open it 1S especially if Drury is available.

Drury over an opening in first seat?

 

 

To be honest, you might have just bid 4S holding four covers and a ruffing value. Partner's weak two should be decent vul vs not in 1st (not sure if GiB understands the nuances of seat and vulnerability though), so even opposite a minimum, 4S should have play.

 

But you are certainly right that the hand is far too good for a weak two opener. 6-4 shape, a great suit and a ton of intermediate cards. I would open 1S every day of the week, and twice on Sundays.

 

ahydra

It depends a lot on how disciplined your preempts are and how you play 2NT: Ogust can describe a hand like this quite well, showing enough for South to bid game and not be tempted to investigate slam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sat32hak82d73ca32&w=s85hq6daj8ckj8764&n=skqj976h9dqt94cqt&e=s4hjt7543dk652c95&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=2sp2np3sppp]399|300|

rmcubed56 complains that GIB underbid the North hand

 

Perhaps South should share the blame when game-prospects are good opposite a weaker North, say

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 6 5 4 2 5 4[/hv]

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...