Avoiding 5-1 S fit after Multi 2D

[nullve]

An idea I got a couple of days ago while responding to the 'Multi 2d' thread:

 

(...)

2♦ = weak-only Multi with either 6(+)M3-OM or 5S3-H4+m (will explain the absence of 3-S5H4+m hands below)

2♥ = weak, 3-S5H4+m (Muiderberg)

2♠ = ? (but not Muiderberg)

(...)

 

 

2♦-?:

 

(...)

2♥ = P/C, likely 1- M or (3)4+S2H

...P = 6(+) H

...2♠ = 6(+) S

...2N = non-MAX (or if you want: MIN), 5S4+m

......3♣ = P/C

......(...)

......3♠ = to play

......(...)

...3m = MAX, 5S4+m

2♠ = P/C, likely 2S2+H or 3S(2)3+H

(...)

 

Some explaination is in order. It occured to me that if

 

2♦ = weak-only Multi with either 6(+)M3-OM or 5M3-OM4+m,

 

then I could think of a good way to diagnose and avoid a 5-1 or 5-0 fit in spades, but not in hearts, so it made sense to remove the 3-S5H4+m hands from Multi 2♦ and play Muiderberg 2♥. But a Multi between the two above in inclusiveness,

 

2♦ = weak-only Multi with either 6(+)3-OM, 5S3-H4+m or 5H5+m,

 

where

 

2♦-2♥; 2♠ = 6(+) S or 5H5+m (!)

 

and everything else is as above, looked (and looks) quite playable, too.

 

 

Thoughts? :unsure:

[etha]

You just play you pass the multi with 4+ diamonds and 0-1 in a major and opener passes with 3 if doubled.