Thoughts on this X...

[elwood913]

Hi all,

 

Had a sequence we hadn't had come up yet, and was wondering what is the best way to think about it...

 

White on red at MP's, opponent deals and opens:

 

(1♣) - 1♠ - (2♥) - 3♣ (Inv+ spade raise)/

(3♠) - X

 

How should this X be interpreted?

 

If it matters, 2♥ was non-forcing an 3♠ was undiscussed.

Also would it matter if the ♠ raise was more or less offensive? Perhaps 2NT showing a 4-card raise?

Thanks!

[The_Badger]

The only sensible interpretation I can come up here (and this is straight off the cuff after a contemplation of the bidding sequence) is that the double means I have first round control of ♠s, nothing more than that. Or perhaps, thinking about it further, this was the bid I would have made but the opponents have beaten me to it.

 

The opener has a strong hand bidding 3♠, so white on red, maybe the overcaller is looking towards a sacrifice in ♠s against their final contract.

 

If anyone can come up with a better explanation, I am all ears, as I too had to have a doubletake on this sequence too,

[nige1]

[hv=d=w&v=e&b=16&a=1C1S2H(N/F)3C(INV !S raise)3SD]133|100| Elwood913 asks "MPs.

How should this X be interpreted?"

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

IMO, North's double shows defensive values with penalty-interest. [/hv]

[sfi]

I typically play it as "please don't lead a spade", but that's hardly an interpretation I would expect without explicit agreement. Other possibilities include a game try with defensive values, or simply suggesting penalty.

[The_Badger]

[hv=d=w&v=e&b=16&a=1C1S2H(N/F)3C(INV !S raise)3SD]133|100| Elwood913 asks "MPs.

How should this X be interpreted?"

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

IMO, North's double shows defensive values with penalty-interest. [/hv]

 

There's that interpretation, too, I agree Nigel, to try to get that magic +200 on your scorecard in MPs given the opponents vulnerability, but the opponents' 3♠ bid isn't looking for a 3NT contract surely? Or maybe it is and East has a minimum for his 2♥ bid and West thinks that North/South are hustling them out of a forlorn contract? I would take the 3♠ here as a splinter knowing that West has quite a few other bids at his disposal.

 

Which also begs the point, how would other players interpret West's 3♠ bid here too? Interesting post.

[nekthen]

Assuming that x is not the fatuous penalty double made by a large number of partners on BBO...

Then i think it is a clear warning to partner that the original 1♠ overcall was defensively oriented and please do not bid 4♠ unless your hand is very offensively oriented

 

Partner's choices are

pass - a minimum overcall with a good spade suit

4♠ - enough to accept an invitation i.e. opening values or better

x - a moderate hand but a poor spade suit

 

You could choose to reverse the meanings of pass and 4♠ but imo this lets the 2♥ bidder off the hook as it seems someone at the table has their rose specs on

[ahydra]

sfi's suggestions are good - "don't lead a spade" is a common expert agreement, and often useful here when the overcall was based on some poor spades so another suit might prove a more fruitful lead against 3NT or 4H. I'd interpret the 3S asking for a stop here, unless West plans to bid on to show some huge hand with hearts.

 

Otherwise, apart from a constructive game try (cf. things like 1S-(2H)-2S-(3H); X) and a penalty suggestion ("extra values"), you could also play it as a sacrifice suggestion ("extra length/ODR"). The game try and penalty are more useful when partner has raised constructively as here, while the sac suggestion is better suited to when the raise was more pre-emptive. But that's a fair bit of memory strain and you'll probably do fine agreeing one meaning for both raise types.

 

ahydra

[heart76]

IMHO W is 2245 or 2146 with 16-17 HCP. N has 5. S havs 10. E has 8.

W is looking for a ♠ stop for a borderline 3NT, with 6-7 sure quick tricks in the minors and possibly a stiff ♥ Q or K. His backup plan is likely 4♥ since he knows E has most likely 6.

Alternatively he has a huge distributional hand with 3 ♥ and is looking for slam.

 

As for N's X, it could well be one of those already suggested by the previous answers. I don't think it can suggest a sacrifice though, as the easiest path there is to wait and bid it. Might be lead-related, but if so it's not looking basic to me. If W has the ♥ slam invitation, the X is likely to be extra length. About strength I am very unsure.

[maartenxq]

I think this double means primarily: P thou shallt not bid 4 ♠. I know what to do. You can double opponents 4 bid if your card allows iot.

 

Maarten Baltussen