Jump to content

Pass out decision


Recommended Posts

IMPs, red vs green, LHO deals and opens 3D, 2 passes follow and you have the now awkward to bid following collection (who said diamond didn’t preempt?):

 

Ax

QJx

xx

AQX9xx

 

Uh?

 

My partner was on the conservative mode that day, if that helps. Slight lead halfway but you have 2 bad boards (incl. a red 6NT-2 with SAK missing, thanks not in’the same hand). I committed a crime on that one, but escaped the sentence (more of that later).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sa7hqj7d86caq9752&d=w&v=n&b=12&a=3Dpp?]133|200|

Apollo1201 writes "My partner was on the conservative mode that day, if that helps. Slight lead halfway but you have 2 bad boards (incl. a red 6NT-2 with SAK missing, thanks not in'the same hand). I committed a crime on that one, but escaped the sentence (more of that later)."

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

I rank

1, Pass = NAT. Fixed.

2. Double = T/O then over 3 try 3N but partner will think you're stronger.

3. 4 = NAT. Unless you've agreed non-leaping Michaels.

4. 3N = NAT. Risky but a good pay-off when it works.[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Called the TD because you psyched a diamond stop?? Or did partner hesitate?

 

I've seen more than a few people punt 3NT in situations like this, though the one time I tried it I went five off or something. Would be interesting to do a simulation, I wouldn't be surprised to find it a winner, particularly red at IMPs.

 

ahydra

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...