VixTD Posted October 31, 2018 Report Share Posted October 31, 2018 This occurred in a knock-out teams match last night: [hv=pc=n&s=sk6hkt654dq72c842&w=saj97hq7d3cakj753&n=sq8542haj82d9854c&e=st3h93dakjt6cqt96&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=p1cp1dp1sp2h(FSF)p4cp5cppp]399|300[/hv]NS cashed two top hearts and switched to spades. West won the ace, played a diamond to the ace and ruffed a diamond high, then drew trumps ending in dummy and led ♦K. At this point he looked as if he was about to claim and had a card detached from his hand. South showed him ♦Q, indicating that it was dropping, congratulated him, put his remaining unplayed cards face-down on the table and reached for his scorecard. West faced the card he had detached from his hand without really looking at it, and turned to North to explain how he could take the rest of the tricks. He started confidently, saying he could discard his spade losers on the diamonds, then stopped, looking puzzled, and said "I think I've miscounted, I have to give you a spade." It was scored as one down. The card he had detached from his hand had been ♣5 rather than a loser, so he ended up with one fewer winner in dummy than he had originally counted. It is not clear to me that he was actually going to play ♣5 on ♦K had play continued, and it obviously wasn't his intention to make that play. He might have just been rearranging his cards in his hand to make a clear demonstration of a claim. He later admitted to me that he had been confused by South's actions. How should this be adjudicated? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted October 31, 2018 Report Share Posted October 31, 2018 I give him the rest of the tricks. Ruffing a high diamond is an irrational play. It sounds like when all the red cards were gone he had a little trouble counting the two adjacent black suits and thought there were more spades than diamonds. And if he's an inexperienced player, I wouldn't be surprised if South's action discombobulated him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve2005 Posted October 31, 2018 Report Share Posted October 31, 2018 South conceded doesn't that ends play.West doesnt have to give a line of play unless North disputes the concession <edit> but North has to say how they get a trick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted October 31, 2018 Report Share Posted October 31, 2018 What he said. West may have miscounted, but South didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamford Posted October 31, 2018 Report Share Posted October 31, 2018 I think South conceded the contract by "abandoning his hand" and play should cease, with the TD adjudicating as equity as possible. That seems to be contract made. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.