Is this a 2C opener, and how best to find slam?

[P_Marlowe]

I play 1C 2H as gf, self sufficient suit which forces opener to cue. It doesnt come up often, but when it does it seems to be a good method to find slam.

Responders hand is certainly worth a SJS (Soloway style), and if you have it av. go for it.

I was reflecting between my auction and MikeH's auction, my auction uses FSF, which is not

really req., and depending on your culture, my 3D FSF bid, may not be FSF for you at all.

If it is FSF, than it gives you one more step room, allowing p, to show something, but ...

the probability is low, that it will be helpful ( On some days, partner may have 65, and he

may be able to show it with 3S, depending on your agreement.)

The SJS auction would allow you to verify, that 7H is not really good. SJS work, they just felt

a bit out of fashion.

[dsLawsd]

Not a 2 club opener- 3 suitted hands need space.

One alternative is to bid 2♦as the reverse and hear partners reply. If partner does not support the forcing heart reply then most likely 6 hearts will close the auction. Someone might guess to try 7 against a stronger team at imps.

[Cyberyeti]

Not a 2 club opener- 3 suitted hands need space.

One alternative is to bid 2♦as the reverse and hear partners reply. If partner does not support the forcing heart reply then most likely 6 hearts will close the auction. Someone might guess to try 7 against a stronger team at imps.

 

If you're going to bid 7, bid it in NT where ♣Q10x onside also bails you out if the hearts don't behave.

[pescetom]

After reading this topic I was amused to see how a similar hand of hearts worked out last night... to avoid confusion I started a new topic in this forum.

[RD350LC]

Sir.INDEED.and VICTOR MOLLO was perhaps the best writer of amusing Bridge stories.

I agree that Victor Mollo was a very good writer of amusing bridge stories. I would add that David Bird and his Abbot stories are just as funny.

[fromageGB]

If you want an oddball reply ...

For me this is a 3-suiter open, with a major shortage, so I have available 1♦ for up to 20hcp, and 2♦ for 21+. The JT in spades, and the void, make it a touch better than would be expected for a normal 20 hcp 4144, so I upgrade to 21 and open 2♦. This is Ekren weak both majors, or the strong 3-suiter. Responder picks his best major of 2M unless seeking game on the weak option, when he bids a general 2NT inquiry or invites in one of the majors. Here if it is both majors I am not interested in spades, so make a game try in hearts by bidding 3♣.

 

3NT from opener shows a 3-suiter short in hearts, and then we just pick a nominal trump suit and find opener's strength range. We are a level higher than after a normal 2M, but the strength indicates slam is not unlikely, so we use the same methods but a level higher than normal.

 

2♦ - 3♣

3NT - 4♠ I have no real intention in playing in spades, as I will probably convert to 6/7NT eventually (I know we have 34hcp minimum), but with this suit I get surefire knowledge of whether the ♠Q is an entry.

4NT(21-23hcp) - 5♣(next step asks singleton or void short suit)

5♥(void, as 5♦ is singleton) - 5NT("ace asking")

6♠(OK, funny method, but this is 0 or 4 out of 5, ie the 3 aces and king of spades, as I have the Q) - 6NT

 

6NT has to be to play, as we don't ask for side kings when an ask commits to grand. I know we have 34-36 hcp, and I have 2 entries with diamonds and spades, so can get the hearts running, but we do lose (probably) that ♥Q. Other than that, I have 15 tricks.

 

Edit - corrected 4♣ typo to 5♣

[fromageGB]

Is perfect hand for a strong 2♦ three suiter bid if you want to wait 6 months for such a hand to come up if Multi isn't allowed.

But if you play an unbalanced 1♦ with exactly the same methods over a weaker 3-suiter, then there is no memory needed for 2♦. 1♦ 3-suiters happen frequently enough that the methods are well engrained.

[steve2005]

Sir I humbly suggest that THE BLUE TEAM CLUB 2D OPENING is available to replace the 2D, as weak in Diamonds, be strongly considered.THE bid covers almost all three suited hands holding 17 to24 HCP

 

I said is a "perfect hand for a strong 2D 3-suiter..."

Blue team would be included in this type of bid.

[pescetom]

I said is a "perfect hand for a strong 2D 3-suiter..."

Blue team would be included in this type of bid.

 

Playing in Italy I still encounter people who open this way.

More often than not we are grateful.

[helene_t]

The Hideous Hog would be in a Moysian 7♠ contract on this and would succeed given a few good breaks in the side suits and a ♣ finesse, even on a trump lead :)

Isn't the best chance of 7♠ to ruff a heart in hand, hoping for trumps 3-3 and ♥Q in a 3-card suit or shorter?

[el mister]

Isn't the best chance of 7♠ to ruff a heart in hand, hoping for trumps 3-3 and ♥Q in a 3-card suit or shorter?

On the actual deal the QH was sitting doubleton offside so 7H and 7N make. 7S also makes as the trumps split 2-4, but drawing 4 trumps then crossing to KD and running hearts sounds like the type of line a beginner takes to make, but an expert rejects and fails. I've not read Mollo, but no doubt there is a caricature of this sort of play in his books.

[pescetom]

On the actual deal the QH was sitting doubleton offside so 7H and 7N make. 7S also makes as the trumps split 2-4, but drawing 4 trumps then crossing to KD and running hearts sounds like the type of line a beginner takes to make, but an expert rejects and fails. I've not read Mollo, but no doubt there is a caricature of this sort of play in his books.

 

What line would your expert then embrace? According to a quick calculation, the beginner line has about 27% chance of success which is slightly better than Helene's line at about 26%.

[Cyberyeti]

What line would your expert then embrace? According to a quick calculation, the beginner line has about 27% chance of success which is slightly better than Helene's line at about 26%.

 

On a trump lead I win in dummy, then ♥AK pitching diamonds, when Q♥ drops there is no probelm, draw trumps and back to the K♦, if it doesn't, cash K♦, play A♣ and ruff one (or take club finesse and ruff one may be even better) draw trumps and hope Q♣ is either triple either side or to 3 or 4 onside depending which line I take.

[pescetom]

On a trump lead I win in dummy, then ♥AK pitching diamonds, when Q♥ drops there is no probelm, draw trumps and back to the K♦, if it doesn't, cash K♦, play A♣ and ruff one (or take club finesse and ruff one may be even better) draw trumps and hope Q♣ is either triple either side or to 3 or 4 onside depending which line I take.

 

I make that about 59% (assuming Q♣ has to be triple either side if the Q♥ fails to drop) so a huge improvement.

[wuudturner]

Is it a 2♣ opener? Not in my book, even though I would be mildly worried about playing it in 1♣. The problem is multi-suited hands are bad for 2♣ openers. You need room to find a fit, if there is one to be had.

 

Since I play weak jumps with my partners, responder just bids 1♡. It is fully forcing. Then the question becomes what is my rebid? I reverse into DIAMONDS, not a jump shift into spades. This gives partner the chance to rebid 2♡, a forcing response to a reverse in our agreements. Given my shape, that is what I expect to hear, and then I can rebid 2♠, getting all three suits off my chest.

 

On that sequence, I'd argue that partner should be able to visualize my three suited shape. But on this hand, partner should take the initiative over my reverse, making a jump in hearts, to 3♡. This is game forcing, and shows a nice suit, though I'm not sure opener will visualize that good of a suit.

 

1♣ - 1♡

2♢ - 3♡

3♠ - 6♡

pass

 

Even opposite a potential void, the North hand should bid slam in hearts.