Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been playing Precision since it was popularized in America by Goren in the 1970's. I remember first playing it in the officer's club and having some of the elder officer's wives having conniptions over our club and diamond bids. But as has been pointed out by others, it is inherently a natural system except for the club and diamond bids, and not one that anyone should be afraid to compete against. At my current club which by the way is for the most part well over 70, many of the club members take great delight in explaining to us what our club and diamond bids mean when we alert them. (I know this is not really legal, but we try to encourage members to have fun as well as compete). Some of the more advanced Precision systems like Super Precision and Transfer Precision do have many more artificial bids, but the way to deal with this is to ban some of those exotic bid types, that others have pointed out can be just as prominent in so-called natural systems, and not throw out a great system that has significant advantages over most.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Swede I come to your club to play. I play Swedish Club with my regular partner. You tell me to go away. I tell you that you cannot discriminate my race. But it's not my race it's your system, you advice. So you tell players from China who play Precision to go away also? Not a good bridge club!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When playing against any artificial system, resist the urge to ask what an alert means. You will be amazed how often opps do not know the answer! If you have no intention of bidding do not ask, ever. If you are confused at the end of the auction, use your right to ask about the bidding. Much faster.

 

Also, how often do you need to ask the meaning of a 1 club bid?

 

Well if what you need to bid over a strong club is 13 cards, but if it's a polish/swedish club (or possibly some strong diamond's 1) you need a decent hand, then every time.

 

The point about the 1 opener and asking bids or relays is that usually these are unopposed auctions when playing Euclidz type opps, so they should be instructed if not intending to bid to just ask for a review of the auction with explanations at the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Pretty much all artificial bids" is not a great description.

 

1!C is an artificial opening; most players playing it will have 1-2 artificial bids in response (showing negative responses) and all others natural. 1!D will often be quite ambiguous in a precision setting, and won't always promise a diamond suit; responses to it are usually natural.

2!D in a precision setting will often show short diamonds, and will have natural responses.

That's 3 artificial bids, only one of which is ambiguous with regards to hand type. Only 1!C needs any kind of artifical defence, and I say"needs" in a very loose sense.

 

By contrast, Benji Acol (which I'm guessing many players at your club play, and none would object to) uses 2C and 2D both as ambiguous, strong bids, with a forced relay in response. Why are they so hung up about a system where there's only one such strong artificial bid? Others will play a multi 2D, perhaps with multiple strong options - a far more ambiguous and artificial convention than anything in standard precision, and much much harder to defend against.

 

I think the main problem that your club members have with precision is probably that they don't play against it often, and is nothing to do with it being "highly artificial".

 

 

 

I should also point out that, yes, the EBU does preclude some artificiality, but it's far more kind than you seem to think it is. Very few common systems are restricted by the EBU. Moscito is the most well-known system I can think of that's not allowed at Level 4 - it uses every 1-level bid for an artificial purpose.

 

I agree with this statement. The only real artificial bids with standard Precision are the 1 opening bid, the 1 response, and (if played, but recommended) the 2

opening bid.

The 2 opening bid is not what non-Precision players are used to, but it is still a natural bid, showing clubs.

Some Precision players will open 1 with only a doubleton, but I don't like that. If it is not strong enough to open a Precision 1 NT bid, and with 3244 distribution (you open 2 with 4144, and others can be opened 1 of a suit), I would pass with 12- hcp.

 

BTW, this is the system recommended by Charles Goren in his book on Precision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could probably achieve the same end by banning everyone under the age of 50...

As a statistician you should realize how silly this suggestion is.

 

It might be true that the majority of people who play exotic systems are young, but it's probably not true that the majority of young players play exotic systems.

 

To put it in terms I'm sure will resonate, it's like banning all Muslims to protect against Islamic terrorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, your club certainly is free to make whatever membership rule it might like, but banning systems by name or label is difficult thing to do.

 

Precision is a strong, artificial, and forcing 1C system. There are many others of these - Blue Club, Schenken Club, Ultimate Club, and LORI Club are among the several that I am familiar with.

 

But is it only the strong variety among artificial club systems that your club membership finds so irritating? What about the not strong and yet still forcing varieties such as, but certainly not limited to, the Polish Club and Roman Club systems?

 

What if the artificial club system is neither strong nor forcing? There are many such systems. I play such a system. 1C shows either 4+ clubs and a non-balanced hand or a balanced hand that other might have opened 1NT when holding it.

I think they made it clear that they're just trying to avoid systems with lots of alerting, not any particular system meaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Alerts are by regulation. Is a club in England required to abide by EBU regulations? No? Then if alerts are the problem, just ban alerts.

 

I assume you're joking, but if this happened one or both of two things would occur:

 

Some idiot like me would devise a system where nothing meant what it looked like.

 

People would get wise to this and ask the meaning of every bid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...