BPO format questions

[whereagles]

Actually, Ben's choice of awarding percentages based on the nr. of votes each option had isn't perhaps the best. But it does have the priceless virtue of being 100% transparent.

[Blofeld]

:)

 

An ideal solution might be to get the panel members to each award a percentage to the bids, and then take the averages (also consider that so far, the fact that there are 101 different scores available hasn't seemed to have any application, as everything awarded has been a multiple of 10% ; if taking averages this would clearly not be the case).

 

But this has the not insignificant disadvantage of demanding a lot more from the panellists.

[luke warm]

actually he *hasn't* always awarded points based on the votes... remember last poll?... i think that if you're gonna have someone judge the choices, etc, that person should have the leeway to choose what seems best, after weighing the logic used for each... that represents a change of mind for me, but that's the way i see it now

[Chamaco]

Is it possible to create INTO the " BPO - Bridge Poll Online" Section, several "subfolders", having one Subfolder for each Problem set ?

 

This way, all the problems, the proposed answers and the following discussions would all be nested into a foldr pertaining to a single problem.

 

It would be easier to navigate through the problem sets and hands. :-)

[Rebound]

IMO the scoring system is fine.

 

I am curious as to why there has not been more support for allowing both participants to be on the panel in the event of a tie. I was under the impression that the composition of the panel is more or less dynamic in any event. It makes sense to break ties if they are a frequent ocurrence, but are they? Just wondering really.