Sayc

[rg14]

1 diamond - 2 clubs

2 NT

 

What is openers range in this sequence ?

[helene_t]

The Sayc Booklet says 12-14 but it also says it is forcing, which is a bit of a contradiction since responder could have a balanced 11-count.

 

I think the easiest way to get around this is to play a direct 2NT response to the 1♦ opening as 11 points. But that has to be agreed since the booklet defines the 2nt response as 13-15.

[awm]

In general the way around this problem is opener's rebid of his suit. So for example 1♠-2♥-2NT is forcing, so with a minimum opener bids 1♠-2♥-2♠. Then responder with a balanced invite can rebid 2NT and we can play there. The auction from this post is even more counter-intuitive, in that you may have to rebid 2♦ on a four (or even three) card suit. But I still think this is the best way to slow down the auction without enough to accept an invite. In fact I usually play that 2NT in these auctions is 18-19 and with 12-14 I rebid the original suit.

 

Do most people who claim to play "SAYC" on BBO know this / agree with this? Surely not. In fact I'd bet that a strong majority think that 1♠-2♥-2NT and 1♦-2♣-2NT are non-forcing (even though the notes are quite clear that responder promises a rebid if below game).

[apollo1201]

The Sayc Booklet says 12-14 but it also says it is forcing, which is a bit of a contradiction since responder could have a balanced 11-count.

 

I think the easiest way to get around this is to play a direct 2NT response to the 1♦ opening as 11 points. But that has to be agreed since the booklet defines the 2nt response as 13-15.

I would believe same (12-14 or 18-19, in the latter case, opener makes further noise, 3NT being some kind of 4441 15-17).

To avoid tricky 23-points game, it is advisable:

1) to avoid bidding 2C with invite hands with 5 clubs; they should try to bid 2NT if not overly frightened by majors (eg Jxx KQx xx AJxxx)

2) to avoid bidding 2NT with 12 unless very good M stoppers or 3-cd D sui only; it is too dangerous to rebid a 3-cd suit (if you have that, then you are 44 M and probably stop well « enough »)

[jfnrl]

This

http://ghbridge.free.fr/affiecta.php?choix=EA12W

could be useful if you read french (the problem is the same in SEF).

 

In few words, 2M in the auction

1D 2C

2D 2M

is ambiguous showing a real suit or a stopper (looking for a stopper in the oM)

 

Now,

1D 2C

2D 2M

3M

shows 4 cards M without stopper in oM

1D 2C

2D 2M

3NT

shows both

[pescetom]

This

http://ghbridge.free.fr/affiecta.php?choix=EA12W

could be useful if you read french (the problem is the same in SEF).

 

In few words, 2M in the auction

1D 2C

2D 2M

is ambiguous showing a real suit or a stopper (looking for a stopper in the oM)

 

Now,

1D 2C

2D 2M

3M

shows 4 cards M without stopper in oM

1D 2C

2D 2M

3NT

shows both

 

I don't play SEF, but as I understand it 1D 2C is GF unless opener rebids 2D... in that sense it is different to the SAYC problem (not to say mess).

[jfnrl]

I don't play SEF, but as I understand it 1D 2C is GF unless opener rebids 2D... in that sense it is different to the SAYC problem (not to say mess).

Right.

i thought that it was the same thing in SAYC

 

"NOTE: Responder promises to bid again if he responded with a new suit at the two

level unless opener’s rebid is at the game level. This applies when responder is an

unpassed hand.

1 — 2

2 = forcing one round. Responder can limit his hand by bidding 2, 2NT,

3, or 3 at this point. He should not pass, since opener could have 18

points (just short of a jump shift rebid)." (SAYC booklet)

[pescetom]

Right.

i thought that it was the same thing in SAYC

 

"NOTE: Responder promises to bid again if he responded with a new suit at the two

level unless opener’s rebid is at the game level. This applies when responder is an

unpassed hand.

1 — 2

2 = forcing one round. Responder can limit his hand by bidding 2, 2NT,

3, or 3 at this point. He should not pass, since opener could have 18

points (just short of a jump shift rebid)." (SAYC booklet)

 

Responder promises to bid again.

That's not the same thing as GF.

If his rebid limits his hand then opener can pass, or at least that's how I understand SAYC.

[jfnrl]

Responder promises to bid again.

That's not the same thing as GF.

If his rebid limits his hand then opener can pass, or at least that's how I understand SAYC.

 

This concerns only 2 auctions (forcing in SEF; NF in SAYC if I understand well) :

 

1D 2C

2NT 3C

 

1D 2C

2NT 3D

 

The + of playing the first NF is that 2NT may show any 12-14 balanced (2D promising 5 cards)

I don't the merit of playing the second NF

[pescetom]

I don't the merit of playing the second NF

The only merit I can see is that it is intuitive following natural logic and that the possibility to stop at 3-level gives more freedom to explore at 2-level.

But it is still a poor system choice IMO, not that SAYC was really designed as a system anyway.