Wacko's world (2)

[Wackojack]

[hv=pc=n&s=s2hat3dqjt754ckq4&n=sakqt83hq5d982c63&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=p1s2c2d2h3dp5dppp]266|200[/hv]

 

Sitting North I blame partner for not bidding 3NT.

[FelicityR]

I personally prefer 2♠ as North instead of raising to 3♦. Then you might arrive in 3NT easier, though I also agree that partner could have bid 3NT himself after your raise, and even a 3♥ bid is possible too by South.

[eagles123]

3d meh u have 6 good spades and 3 crap diamonds, but i guess support with support! 5D is a lazy bid though

[rmnka447]

This time it's fair to criticize your partner's jump to 5 ♦.

 

Holding a minor fit, 3 NT, if biddable, should be a priority.

 

 

However, I think rebidding 2 ♠ is better with this absolutely minimum hand. Ir would lead to something like this

 

….

 

2 ♠ - 2 NT

 

3 ♦ - 3 ♥

 

3 NT

 

where 3 ♥ asks for a part stopper.

[Winstonm]

I personally prefer 2♠ as North instead of raising to 3♦. Then you might arrive in 3NT easier, though I also agree that partner could have bid 3NT himself after your raise, and even a 3♥ bid is possible too by South.

 

I wouldn't quibble too much about an initial 2S bid. Poor shape and a quack-2 isn't much of a hand.

 

That said, given the restraints of this auction, I would have bid 2S before even thinking about raising diamonds.

[ahydra]

I would rebid 2S as North and just blast 3N as South over that.

 

ahydra

[Wackojack]

Yes as Helene said: I was sitting in the opposite seat on this hand too. I just wanted to check that the forum would not have raised to 3♦ with rubbish 3 card support and instead rebid 2♠ with a good 6 card suit.

[neilkaz]

Yes as Helene said: I was sitting in the opposite seat on this hand too. I just wanted to check that the forum would not have raised to 3♦ with rubbish 3 card support and instead rebid 2♠ with a good 6 card suit.

Am also a 2♠ rebidder and wouldn't not have blasted 5♦ on the actual sequence.