Accept or decline invite?

[ahydra]

Matchpoints, strong field. Opps are vul, you're not.

 

[hv=pc=n&w=sk954hkj4dk8ck642&d=s&v=n&b=15&a=p1n(12-14)p2s(range%20ask%20or%20clubs)p]133|200[/hv]

 

1NT: 12-14

2S: range ask or clubs. Your responses are 2NT with min, 3C with max. Which do you pick?

 

ahydra

[steve2005]

i accept. only real negative to this hand is it's aceless. surely partner has some aces to go with your kings so no big deal.

[WellSpyder]

i accept. only real negative to this hand is it's aceless. surely partner has some aces to go with your kings so no big deal.

I decline. I have no intermediates to speak of or useful honour combinations, making the playing strength below par for the point count. The only factor that makes me hesitate is that I would prefer the lead to run up to my hand if partner wants to play in 3♣ anyway.

[P_Marlowe]

Hi,

 

min, I see 7 running tricks, ..., if the KJ combo would be a Ace, I could go with max.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

[Winstonm]

I'm going to downgrade an aceless hand that also lacks spot cards.

[NickRW]

decline

[Phil]

Definitely decline.

 

Under average 13/ aceless / spotless/ balanced. Many 12's are better.

 

The only non-negative is that we at least have half our hand in the minors where partner probably lives.

[apollo1201]

I accept only with 13 and some good things, or 14. Here it is a bad to average 13 (4432 fine, but aceless, scattered Kings, no intermediaries...), so I decline this one. I believe partner is checking range, because if partner is weak with 6+ clubs, opponents have some 20+ HCPs and are short in clubs so could have acted.

 

Just a side question, what is the reason for this 2-meaning bid? 2NT = transfer to D and 3C = sth else (Puppet Stayman?). Avoids using 2C Stayman with an invite w/o majors to avoid describing declarer’s hand? Thanks!

[Cyberyeti]

Horrible system, I don't know if K♣ is vital or no more interesting than anything else.

 

If partner has ♣Axxxxx(x) and an ace, I want to play 3N, if he has a random 11 I really don't.

[rmnka447]

Decline with 2 NT. Like others no As, no spots make me pessimistic.

[Tramticket]

It's not quite this simple. I would only be inviting with the East hand at MPs if I hold 12 or a particularly good 11. So I figure that we are likely to hold 25 for the partnership. I will usually accept with 13.

 

But, our 13 is below average and making 3NT with 25 is only just with the odds. So, with a poor 13, game is probably a little less than 50%. I decline, but think it is closer than others are suggesting.

[gszes]

I consider this hand slightly below average for a 13 count. I would bid the systemic

 

2n

[MrAce]

Very close decision IMO but I'd accept.

[neilkaz]

Decline with 2 NT. Like others no As, no spots make me pessimistic.

 

Same for me 2NT with this mediocre, at best, 13 count with no aces or tens and no 5 card suit.

[FelicityR]

Decline. Aceless. No intermediates. Anyway, surely you only accept with a maximum, not a sorry-looking 13 count. You have no idea whether partner has ♣s or not, and the likelihood is that as you have 4♣s in your hand he/she doesn't.

[Tramticket]

surely you only accept with a maximum, not a sorry-looking 13 count.

 

If your strategy is to invite with all 11/12 points hands then you probably do need a maximum 14 to accept.

 

if he has a random 11 I really don't.

 

I suggest that most 11's are not worth an invite - particularly at MPs - unless they have extras (five-card suit etc.). With this strategy, you should be tending to accept with most 13/14 point hands and a 13-point hand needs to be particularly poor to decline the invitation.

 

For me, the decision is close but I do decline. The main negatives for me are (1) lack of a five-card suit and fewer than half of our points in the four-card suits; (2) Isolated honours, not supporting each other (apart from the heart suit, which is only a three-card suit); (3) lack of intermediates supporting the honours.

 

I am much less worried about the lack of aces, when we are proposing to play a no-trump contract. Aces are under-valued by the standard point system - we all know that. But this issue is much more significant in suit contracts than no-trump contracts.

[PhantomSac]

The nicest thing i can say about accepting is that it is absolutely hopeless

[ArtK78]

The nicest thing i can say about accepting is that it is absolutely hopeless

 

A pretty pithy description of the situation.

 

I was asked if I had a maximum. I don't. What more is there to say than that?

 

[ahydra]

The nicest thing i can say about accepting is that it is absolutely hopeless

 

Well, there's always the fact 3NT makes :):

 

[hv=pc=n&s=s62haq85d96543cj7&w=sk954hkj4dk8ck642&n=sqt87h762dajtcq53&e=saj3ht93dq72cat98&d=s&v=n&b=15&a=p1n(12-14)p2s(range%20ask%20or%20!c)p2nppp]399|300[/hv]

 

but at the table I declined the invite (as was the majority view here), evaluating the hand to a pretty ordinary 13 and not playing teams. (At teams I feel one should generally accept with any non-min, rather than explicitly a max.) I suppose the position in hearts is rather fortunate.

 

ahydra

[sfi]

The positions in spades, diamonds and clubs aren't so bad either.

[rmnka447]

Well, there's always the fact 3NT makes :)

 

but at the table I declined the invite (as was the majority view here), evaluating the hand to a pretty ordinary 13 and not playing teams. (At teams I feel one should generally accept with any non-min, rather than explicitly a max.) I suppose the position in hearts is rather fortunate.

 

ahydra

 

I'd be very tempted to just bid 3 NT with responder's hand. It is a terrific hand. The intermediate combinations are big positives.

[Phil]

Reverse the NS hands and you are gasping for 7.

 

Hardly an validation that game is good.