Jump to content

6-6 in the majors after they open 3N gambling....


foobar

Recommended Posts

It helps if you play some sort of defence against Gambling.

I recommend Multi Landy, so bid 4C to show both majors.

If partner makes simple preference (4M), you can ask for key cards

because partner's possible key card(s) is not going to be the

ace of diamonds. If partner asks for longer major with 4D, jump to 5S.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It helps if you play some sort of defence against Gambling.

I recommend Multi Landy, so bid 4C to show both majors.

If partner makes simple preference (4M), you can ask for key cards

because partner's possible key card(s) is not going to be the

ace of diamonds. If partner asks for longer major with 4D, jump to 5S.

It makes sense to play the same defence to 3NT as to 1NT, assuming you are able to show a range of single-suiter and two-suiter hand types by doing so. Double should include all strong balanced or strong three-suiter hands, with double followed by double showing the balanced type (or that the opponents' suit is not the one in which you are short) while double followed by pass shows the other three suits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

X.

 

Should reveal openers minor, given that it is hard to see, that they are really trying to sit it out.

If Opener reveals his minor, ..., keep cue bidding.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

 

PS: I would not bother discussing a special defence against 3NT, the bid does not come up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses.

 

The bidding at our table was a little comical, but who can argue with the result :D?

 

(3N) - X - (5) - 6 - (P) - 6 - (7) - X - (P) - 7 - AP

 

Pard held:

 

K9xx

AJxx

xxx

Kx

 

My X was a poor choice because they might sit for it and it can easily make. Pard's 6 was bold but very well judged, but I was still debating the choice of the X when it came around to me, and should have bid the grand. 7 was a great sac, until I finally got it right on the third try.

 

In retrospect, perhaps 4N (ostensibly showing a powerful two suiter) might be a better bid with my hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It makes sense to play the same defence to 3NT as to 1NT, assuming you are able to show a range of single-suiter and two-suiter hand types by doing so. Double should include all strong balanced or strong three-suiter hands, with double followed by double showing the balanced type (or that the opponents' suit is not the one in which you are short) while double followed by pass shows the other three suits.

 

An old fashioned defence to 1NT is to play a 2NT overcall as a game forcing unspecified 2-suiter. Perhaps (3NT)-4NT should be a slam forcing unspecified 2-suiter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...