eagles123 Posted February 28, 2018 Report Share Posted February 28, 2018 [hv=pc=n&n=sak8hk543dkjtc432&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=pp3cpp3dp]133|200[/hv] 3NT now is ... If you feel that N should have come in over 3C, the poll for that part of the auction is here: https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/bidding-problem-2-12hzwxmho7/ Thanks, Eagles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted February 28, 2018 Report Share Posted February 28, 2018 I would pass. 3♥ or 3NT could work, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted February 28, 2018 Report Share Posted February 28, 2018 I'd bid 3N Partner is balancing but he has to have SOMETHING and lord knows he doesn't have much in Diamonds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 I'd bid 3N Partner is balancing but he has to have SOMETHING and lord knows he doesn't have much in Diamonds But what can he have that he doesn't open 1♦ or 2♦ ? This is somewhat style dependent, and the correct bid may depend on that, we'd open most of the hands where 3N makes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagles123 Posted March 1, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 this was with a BBO random nutcase so it's more a theoretical question, but for the sake of the question assume 2/1 5542 relatively solid preempts and three weak 2's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 I think pd has 6♦+4M and not enough to open 1♦, which also explains why he did not open weak 2♦ (due to side major).He may even have 6-5 and 6-8 hcp. In order to make 3 NT we will need him to hold ♣A +♦A and have to guess diamonds right, too small target to shoot for IMO.This is assuming there is a guess in diamonds, There might not be one even if our LHO has Qx due to the blockage in diamond suit.I would never pass 3 ♣ at the first place by the way, but I may be minority.I am bidding 4♣ now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagles123 Posted March 1, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 I think pd has 6♦+4M and not enough to open 1♦, which also explains why he did not open weak 2♦ (due to side major).He may even have 6-5 and 6-8 hcp. In order to make 3 NT we will need him to hold ♣A +♦A and have to guess diamonds right, too small target to shoot for IMO.This is assuming there is a guess in diamonds, There might not be one even if our LHO has Qx due to the blockage in diamond suit.I would never pass 3 ♣ at the first place by the way, but I may be minority.I am bidding 4♣ now. as I said, I polled that elsewhere, but I think it's real close Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 as I said, I polled that elsewhere, but I think it's real close Yes, in BW and I voted there too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagles123 Posted March 1, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 Yes, in BW and I voted there too. Yes, I saw that Timo, I didn't mean it negatively lol, just to point again people for the other decision in what i think is an interesting hand :) It was nothing against u dude :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 Yes, I saw that Timo, I didn't mean it negatively lol, just to point again people for the other decision in what i think is an interesting hand :) It was nothing against u dude :) I know m8, all good. I was not offended. You are one of the guys I like a lot in these forums. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagles123 Posted March 1, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 lol I feel the same bro :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 But what can he have that he doesn't open 1♦ or 2♦ ? This is somewhat style dependent, and the correct bid may depend on that, we'd open most of the hands where 3N makes. ♠ Qxxx♥ VOID♦ Axxxxx♣Kxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmnka447 Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 I just don't see bidding 3 NT with this hand. If you do so, you're betting that partner can provide a ♣ stopper or that ♣ block. With ♣ 432 in hand, I just don't like those odds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilG007 Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 [hv=pc=n&n=sak8hk543dkjtc432&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=pp3cpp3dp]133|200[/hv] 3NT now is ... If you feel that N should have come in over 3C, the poll for that part of the auction is here: https://bridgewinners.com/article/view/bidding-problem-2-12hzwxmho7/ Thanks, EaglesI wouldn't take any action at all Yes it may sound craven but there's no point in trying to be heroic either...the cemeteries are fullof "Heroes" So gimmee the "White Feathers" now :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tramticket Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 I'm attracted to a 3NT bid in a masochistic sort of way. the 3♣ bidder probably won't have a running suit (they might open 3NT). So either partner or RHO has a club honour and it is more likely to be partner since he is showing some values. Of course partner's club holding might be ♣K or ♣QX ... but if you bid it confidently he might lead something else. :) Risky. But I might do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbrat Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 Any two aces make 3nt, with dQ falling.Both red aces with P, if E is void in c.But what are the odds? Not good enough to me.I would expect myself to Pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0deary Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 If we play in 3D (tick I guess) but everyone else make 3N then we lose ~9imps and partner is a little irritated you didn’t X If we try 3NT and everyone else is it in: it’s a push but partner is aware that you took a big position when X is normal If everyone else was in 3D but you make 3NT then of course you gain ~9 imps, and partner smiles, but in a funny sort of way If everyone else was in 3D but you slip -1 in 3N we lose ~6imps, and partner is not amused And if you try 3N but S had Kx C and East leads eg JC you are going to feel very queasy and S....well at the minimum that’s the last time S will balance weak in future. 3N-4 cf 3D tick just costs the 12imps. And if East suddenly awakes and doubles then it’s just the 15 imps. South apologises to the Director and leaves the club complaining of a terrible headache, and your calls will not be returned So put me down for Pass and see if E awakens. Even if not let partner have the pleasure of a useful + score, making an imp because it was played so well as everyone else is in 3D too. It we missed 3N then apologise immediately and turn to the next hand asap: your turn at the bar, again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nekthen Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 ♠ Qxxx♥ VOID♦ Axxxxx♣Kxx 28 zar points a standard 1♦ opener Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 Any two aces make 3nt, with dQ falling. In your dreams Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 ♠ Qxxx♥ VOID♦ Axxxxx♣Kxx Easy 1♦ for us, and btw a 4 card major doesn't put us off a weak 2. The only hand I could come up with was 7 diamonds to the ace and the club ace, we wouldn't preempt with 2 aces. More interesting question if your openers are more standard 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 I'm attracted to a 3NT bid in a masochistic sort of way. the 3♣ bidder probably won't have a running suit (they might open 3NT). So either partner or RHO has a club honour and it is more likely to be partner since he is showing some values. Of course partner's club holding might be ♣K or ♣QX ... but if you bid it confidently he might lead something else. :) Risky. But I might do it. This did occur to me, if you have a stopper in the bidding, you don't always need one in the play, and a singleton club opposite a 3rd seat preempt is not desperately attractive as a lead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszes Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 MADNESS was such a nice response but since 7n was so much worse I could not quite bring myself to vote for it on the 3N issue. Why was there not a choice of "total disrespect for south's ability to balance"??? p p 3c p (don't get me started on this) p what does south know about the hand? rho averages around 8 lho averages around 8 for the preempt that leaves OUR side with an average of around 24. That means south can easily figure out north's average holding and tailor their passout seat bid accordingly.If I figured north to have around 14 and I was looking at longish diamonds and a club stop would I not try 3n with a hand like x QJxx Axxxxx Kx? South balancing with 3d should be a huge red flag to north. South would try very hard to bid 3n if it looked reasonable and yet they backed in with 3d. I would make the case that south is vastly more likely to hold some sort of 45 or 46 hand w/o a club stop than any holding with a club stop. The decision for me would be is my hand now worth a shot at game opposite my passed partner and 3n is NOT the target. Would you balance with 3d with a holding of Qx Qxx Qxxxxxx x? I think such a balance by a passed hand is a lot less mad than 3n by north on the given conditions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 Would you balance with 3d with a holding of Qx Qxx Qxxxxxx x? I think such a balance by a passed hand is a lot less mad than 3n by north on the given conditions. Only if I'd forgotten to open 2♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 [hv=pc=n&n=sak8hk543dkjtc432&d=e&v=n&b=2&a=pp3cpp3dp]133|200|3NT now is ...[/hv]Partner passed in 2nd seat but could hold any of a variety of hands. For example♠ Q x ♥ Q x x ♦ Q x x x x ♣ A x x♠ x x x x ♥ Q x ♦ A Q x x x ♣ Q x♠ Q x ♥ A Q x ♦ x x x x x x ♣ Q x I rank Pass = NAT. Thank you partner. Take the money.4♦ = G/T. Try for vul game.5♦ = NAT Landy try for vul game.4♣ = CUE Showing ♦ fit but game aspirations are optimistic and slam even more so.3N = NAT Brave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted March 1, 2018 Report Share Posted March 1, 2018 I'm attracted to a 3NT bid in a masochistic sort of way. the 3♣ bidder probably won't have a running suit (they might open 3NT). So either partner or RHO has a club honour and it is more likely to be partner since he is showing some values. Of course partner's club holding might be ♣K or ♣QX ... but if you bid it confidently he might lead something else. :) Risky. But I might do it. Will you make 3 NT if pd has the hand you asked for and opponents did not make the lead you are scared of? xxxxAAxxxxxQx Assume they led ♥ (and I am guaranteeing you 2-2 ♦) (perhaps you need to bid 3 NT very very fast so that they will lead neither clubs nor hearts!!http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) OR will you make 3 NT when pd has a legit ♣ stopper and god forbid opening leader decides to lead the suit shown by his pd? JTxxxA9xxxxAx http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/wink.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts