dickiegera Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 [hv=pc=n&e=sk53hajtdacaqt642&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=1h1s2sp3dp]133|200|NOW WHAT????[/hv] 2♠ was intended to be a game forcing raise in hearts. Partner and I were not on same page. What should I bid next?I chose 3♥ and partner passed.I was hoping West would bid 4♥ so I could bid 4NT keycard asking. How should we have bid this? Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masse24 Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 I would start with 3♠. I will add--2♠ would, for many, be a limit raise or better. Therefore 3♥ may be passed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tramticket Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 Partner and I were not on same page. If it was a pick-up partner, then just shrug and move on. If it was a regular partner, you need to discuss, as it is a common sequence. You can agree to play the cue-bid as forcing to game. Personally the cue bid is "invitational or stronger" (F1) in our partnership (4-card majors / weak NT). The 3♦ bid is a trial bid and 3♥ is a sign-off. We would cue-bid here rather than bidding 3♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggwhiz Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 2♠ is most commonly a limit or better for hearts and that makes 3♥ only a limit raise and passable. 4nt directly is rkc but on what suit? It's hearts in my partnership as being the suit that I supported (via the cue) but thoroughly discussed. Otherwise you can bid 3♠ followed by 4nt but have the same problem of what the kc suit is so discuss whether the 2♠ bid guarantees hearts or not and end up blasting 6♥ if you haven't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmnka447 Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 You're looking at a huge hand opposite partner's opening bid. Personally, I would have started out with a descriptive and forcing 2 ♣ bid, planning on raising hearts later. But given the actual auction where 2 ♠ shows a ♥ fit and invitational+ values, I think the next bid should be 3 ♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 Most players I know use the immediate cue bid as "limit raise or better". However, with a real good side suit there is no rush to support hearts. As 2C would be a 1-round force, I would bid 2C and follow up with next round with either a heart raise or a secondary cue bid, depending on the auction. If the auction continues with 3D by partner, I would bid 4H as the diamond bid does not help the hand. If partner raised clubs or rebid hearts, I would take stronger action, including a cue bid of spades. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 Most players I know use the immediate cue bid as "limit raise or better". However, with a real good side suit there is no rush to support hearts. As 2C would be a 1-round force, I would bid 2C and follow up with next round with either a heart raise or a secondary cue bid, depending on the auction. If the auction continues with 3D by partner, I would bid 4H as the diamond bid does not help the hand. If partner raised clubs or rebid hearts, I would take stronger action, including a cue bid of spades. So you're going to bid your 18 count as a 13 count because the diamond bid didn't help you ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 So you're going to bid your 18 count as a 13 count because the diamond bid didn't help you ? At this point, we have to decide whether to overbid or underbid - your mileage may vary. My experience taught me that overbids are more costly for the most part. And on a totally unrelated subject, the benefit of a weak 2D bid IMO is that it steals all those nuanced auctions with reverses and Lebenohl and such and puts the auction for the opponents back into a more basic structure. Surely that is worth something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 At this point, we have to decide whether to overbid or underbid - your mileage may vary. My experience taught me that overbids are more costly for the most part. And on a totally unrelated subject, the benefit of a weak 2D bid IMO is that it steals all those nuanced auctions with reverses and Lebenohl and such and puts the auction for the opponents back into a more basic structure. Surely that is worth something. I feel my 18 count has got miles better, the spade K figures to be behind the A if partner doesn't have it, we are potentially making a slam opposite the right 8 count (xx, KQxxx, xxxx, Kx) and a grand opposite the right 12 (same with A♠), I don't feel I can just sign off. That said I agree with you that 2♣ is MUCH better than 2♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 I feel my 18 count has got miles better, the spade K figures to be behind the A if partner doesn't have it, we are potentially making a slam opposite the right 8 count (xx, KQxxx, xxxx, Kx) and a grand opposite the right 12 (same with A♠), I don't feel I can just sign off. That said I agree with you that 2♣ is MUCH better than 2♠. I agree that the spade King seems well-positioned - but I don't have trump length to take care of losing diamonds so I need a club fit to produce a lot of tricks. Obviously, if everyone agreed about every hand there would be no swings. :D I also don't think 4H is a sign-off - the question for partner to ask is why did I bid clubs with a game strength heart raise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 I agree that the spade King seems well-positioned - but I don't have trump length to take care of losing diamonds so I need a club fit to produce a lot of tricks. Obviously, if everyone agreed about every hand there would be no swings. :D I also don't think 4H is a sign-off - the question for partner to ask is why did I bid clubs with a game strength heart raise? Sorry, your earlier post was somewhat off, I read the If the auction continues with 3D by partner, I would bid 4H as the diamond bid does not help the hand. If partner raised clubs or rebid hearts, I would take stronger action, including a cue bid of spades.bit as after a 2♠ start, if you've bid 2♣, partner can continue with 2♦ and you have space. Also you don't even necessarily need to take care of diamond losers Ax, KQ98x, any5, x you have a good chance of a crossruff or dummy reversal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 If you just wanted to ask for keycards you may as well do it immediately after 3♦. Or would that be keycards with diamonds as trump? It shouldn't be. Hearts was already agree with your 2♠ bid. If you are not sure if hearts is the agreed trump suit and not sure if 3♥ is forcing, maybe it is safer to bid 3♠ or 4♣. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winstonm Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 Sorry, your earlier post was somewhat off, I read the bit as after a 2♠ start, if you've bid 2♣, partner can continue with 2♦ and you have space. Also you don't even necessarily need to take care of diamond losers Ax, KQ98x, any5, x you have a good chance of a crossruff or dummy reversal. Right. I sometimes lose track in these posted auctions - after 2C, 2D - Duh! :) In that case I would follow with 3H, which is surely forcing (I would play 2H as not forcing, btw. With interference, we always resorted to a basic style where a 2/1 was only a 1-round force.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 2♠ was intended to be a game forcing raise in hearts. Partner and I were not on same page. What should I bid next?I chose 3♥ and partner passed.I was hoping West would bid 4♥ so I could bid 4NT keycard asking. How should we have bid this? Thank you Starting 2♣ can backfire badly if the auction proceeds like.. [hv=d=w&v=0&b=8&a=1h1s2c2s3dp]133|100[/hv] or [hv=d=w&v=0&b=8&a=1h1s2c3s4dp]133|100[/hv] We will have problem convincing pd we have a genuine ♥ fit and not just making a simple preference. (there are many other examples, including the hands where opener can raise you in clubs, which may cause serious issues)And no, What Winstonm said makes no sense to jump to 4♥ over 3♦ shows such a giant hand and expect pd to go slam when you are the one holding all these aces and 2nd round control in opponent suit. That is as polite as I can express my opinions on that suggestion. So I am with you on starting 2♠ Regarding your questions; if 2♠ was GF in your agreements than we know who is to blame for passing before game. However, if 2♠ was LROB (limit raise or better) you needed to do something different than 3♥. I would bid 4♣ with your hand. You said you were hoping pd to bid 4♥ so you can RKCB it. Bid 4 ♣ now and RKCB when pd signs-off (better if he cues too). Having said all of this, here is an important detail. Even if 2♠ was limit or better, opener should never bid 3♦ if he has a hand that would not accept game invitation. So you may argue that even if 2♠ was intended as LROB, after 3♦, 3♥ should be forcing. But good luck with arguing this in a pdship where simple cue is GF or can be limit has yet to be agreed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 Right. I sometimes lose track in these posted auctions - after 2C, 2D - Duh! :) In that case I would follow with 3H, which is surely forcing (I would play 2H as not forcing, btw. With interference, we always resorted to a basic style where a 2/1 was only a 1-round force.) I would play 2♥ as NF but prob only 2♥ or 3334I would play 3♥ as nat inv 3♥ 10-11 ish not 3334I would need to 4th suit and raise This makes sense for us because we probably open lighter than you do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 Having said all of this, here is an important detail. Even if 2♠ was limit or better, opener should never bid 3♦ if he has a hand that would not accept game invitation. So you may argue that even if 2♠ was intended as LROB, after 3♦, 3♥ should be forcing. But good luck with arguing this in a pdship where simple cue is GF or can be limit has to be agreed yet. I'd disagree, we don't have exactly this situation in our system, but we use 3♦ as a long suit try in some vaguely similar ones to focus partner's eyes on their diamond suit if they have an invite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 I'd disagree, we don't have exactly this situation in our system, but we use 3♦ as a long suit try in some vaguely similar ones to focus partner's eyes on their diamond suit if they have an invite. I know many people do that mistake of trying to be scientific and descriptive on game trial hands. Trying to stop on dime. Good luck with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahydra Posted February 20, 2018 Report Share Posted February 20, 2018 In the debate as to whether to bid 2S or 2C first time - why not start with 3C fit bid? :) Over 3D I would probably choose 3S, which is either a cue for hearts or a stop ask, but you don't mind which. 4C is a good alternative if it doesn't outright deny a spade control (I don't think it should). 3H is a mistake as it's non-forcing - it shows you had a minimum for 2S. Alternatively, as others have pointed out 4NT is RKC for hearts here (since 2S is agreeing hearts) - if that's what you wanted to bid, now's a good a time as any. ahydra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msjennifer Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 We play a 2C bid forcing so that’s what I shall bid and not 2S.The bigger your hand the slower you proceed by making appropriate forcing bids.Thats what was taught me..That way you can find your partners hand more clearly.In the present auction I shall jump to 6 H,whether one likes it or not,as I have made the 2S bid earlier . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tramticket Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 I know many people do that mistake of trying to be scientific and descriptive on game trial hands. Trying to stop on dime. Good luck with that. Is it that you disagree with trial bids generally? Would 1♥, 2♥; 3♦ be a trial bid for you? or is the problem more specific? i.e. partner has already shown invitational values (say 10/11+) and it is trying to be too precise and scientific to make a return trial bid? If it is this, then I tend to agree. 3♦ in this auction is pretty pointless as a trial bid. But we don't have any other use for the 3♦ bid - so if partner bid 3♦ I would interpret it as a trial. What would you use 3♦ for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0deary Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 After the 1S my ranging shot is likely 6N in match points and 6/7H in imps Ideally I’d like to ask west: “Have you got the AS? How many spades have you? How many diamonds? Have you got the KC? How solid are your red suits?” It would be lovely if we avoid a bad slam missing AS, a spade ruff, trump loser (ruffing out the Ds could expose that) and missing/bad placed KC, but I can’t find all that out After the 3D I’m forcing 3S again- I doubt if west can bid 3N but I’m interested in more shape information, then the Black... There could be a problem using the RKCB that you suggested next, but sometimes a problem can offer a neat solution too! When I bid 4N west will have to rely on the general agreement that “without express agreement to a suit {we haven’t actually agreed hearts} I’ll assume that you are RKCB in the last suit bid” and if it went 3S-4C-4N then 5H now shows west the AS and the KC, making 7H a real goer Failing that at least you can make a reasonable judgement of contract and level, without trying to ride a bicycle backwards as happens after opening weak in first position and then back-pedalling :) Bon chance! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diana_eva Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Everyone please keep your replies polite and constructive. This is the intermediate-advanced forum, either say something helpful if you feel you have something to bring to this discussion, or don't say anything at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromageGB Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 2♠ was intended to be a game forcing raise in hearts. Partner and I were not on same page. What should I bid next?I chose 3♥ and partner passed. I was hoping West would bid 4♥ so I could bid 4NT keycard asking. How should we have bid this?Go back a bit. If partner misunderstood 2♠ then you certainly can't bid 3♥ because it is not forcing. In a situation where a wheel comes off ( I speak from much experience), you must be thankful your bid was not passed, and eschew any further "scientific" bidding in the auction. Who knows what partner thinks you have? If you originally intended to ace ask then you must do so immediately, or bid 4♥ if not. Others have suggested 3♠ - but this obviously just confirms you have a long spade suit and that the opposition bid was a psyche.Or 4♣ - probably a weak extreme 2-suiter.You have no alternative to 4+♥ or 4NT - and with the latter then hope over the 5♦ reply he does not take your 5♥ signoff as asking for the Q of diamonds, if that's your method. 4NT carries this risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0deary Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 PS (after the posting above)... Actually it just struck me that the traditional move over 5H is 5N- “bid 6 with one top honour” and “bid 7 with two top honours” Perfect! Except west is still thinking we are in a C slam, not the H slam, so naturally west will just bid 6C Now east must come out of the shadows and bid 6H What would west make of this? It would need an angel to suss whats going on and even if west did: would west actually move to 7 in the real word? After the 5H East could count 6C+2S= 8 but can I guarantee 7 red tricks for 7N? :) I feel a 6H+1 coming on whatever! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAce Posted February 21, 2018 Report Share Posted February 21, 2018 Everyone please keep your replies polite and constructive. This is the intermediate-advanced forum, either say something helpful if you feel you have something to bring to this discussion, or don't say anything at all. Did you remove some replies? Because I did not get what you are saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts