Jump to content

Your turn


MrAce

Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&s=sak5hakqjt5dj6cj5&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=3cp5d]133|200[/hv]

 

MP

EW are worldclass opponents and they are not fan of Roth Stone preempts.

 

There is an argument for jumping directly to 6H, hoping to increase the penalty when the opps take the push to 7 clubs or diamonds. But my bid is a simple 5H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=sak5hakqjt5dj6cj5&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=3cp5d]133|200|MP. EW are worldclass opponents and they are not fan of Roth Stone preempts.[/hv]

I rank

  1. 5 = NAT. The pre-empt forces us to gamble.
  2. Double = PEN. Might be a better choice if you knew what to lead.
  3. Pass = NAT. Timid.
  4. 6 = NAT. Brave bluff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 just looks sensible. Double is too ambiguous. Pass is scary cat. Anything else is not showing world-class opponents the respect they deserve. You're semi-balanced with 6322 and two worthless doubletons, but there's a good chance partner can turn up with either a honour or a singleton in one of the minors and trumps to ruff a loser for -300 at the most. At this level it's a guessing game so I was told it's always best to bid what's in your hand. So 5 it is.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's well know that LoTT falls down with these high level decisions.

 

I like 5H because it has a few ways to win over double:

 

- It makes

- It is a good save

- They push on to 6m and go off

 

Double only really wins when they are not making 5D and we are not making 5M. I accept this is more likely than any of the above which is why it's close but I still think it's best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why has responder not supported clubs? I'll try X. Nige1, I'd lead the SA.

 

edit: this is where MrAce tells us they were playing transfer pre-empts :)

 

ahydra

 

No I won't :)

 

What do you think E should bid with

 

Void

xxx

AKQxxxxx

Kx

 

?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I won't :)

 

What do you think E should bid with

 

Void

xxx

AKQxxxxx

Kx

 

?

 

Kantar wrote a funny article about a number of similar hands where every time he was given them as a lead problem he would pick the A (3 of those cashed) instead of the obvious spade on the theory of "why are they asking?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double

 

If the decision were at the 4 level, 4 would be logical.

 

But without any distribution in "their" suits, I find it hard to make a 5 level call. There's just no way to know what's in partner's hand and too much chance of a crossruff between the opponents in their suits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is anyone else concerned about double with 2-2 in the minors, suggesting good splits? I'm not sure who is sacrificing but I'm inclined to think it is us.

 

This is also what I think.

I also believe, it may be hard for them to double us because I have the AKQJT of my suit and they bid due to their shape and very long suits and not due to strength. After all you may have a void in one of their suits and spades running (according to the what they expect you to hold)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is also what I think.

I also believe, it may be hard for them to double us because I have the AKQJT of my suit and they bid due to their shape and very long suits and not due to strength. After all you may have a void in one of their suits and spades running (according to the what they expect you to hold)

 

That's why I chose 5H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...