Jump to content

Event 10 format information and score reporting


frank0

Recommended Posts

Powerduck 21 - Derppp 27

 

Part#1: 9 boards

=======================

There was a problem with the matches between Derppp and me. I finished my boards, but Derppp was not able to play all 16 boards (thru 9) when his time expired.

 

The result at that point was

 

Powerduck 5 - Derppp 10

http://webutil.bridg...264&u=powerduck

=======================

Part#2: 7 boards

=======================

Powerduck 16 - Derppp 17

http://webutil.bridgebase.com/v2/tview.php?t=ARDCHALLENGE:c3cf924c.8f3d.11e7.8113.0cc47a39aeb4-1504288109&u=powerduck

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I played pio_magic and after playing the last hand, the results popped up, but wouldn't load onto a page where I could copy and paste the results to here. Waited about 45 minutes, and now the results aren't in my recent tournament file. Each of the hands are in recent hands though, and I can see what the total was (I won 46-21) but I can't prove it here, maybe he could post the total page for me, or someone could help me figure out how to find it. Thanks
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@barmar can you check results of people who didn't post hand record link?

 

@everyone please make sure you post the hand record link or any proof (e.g. screen shot) if the link is not available. Make sure you finish on time. Don't start the match if it's about to expire, resend the challenge instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah. In that case, no idea. My calculations shows a diamond lead averages over 1 IMP better than a heart lead on both auctions.

It's possible that your simulation uses somewhat different criteria for the hands that will jump directly to 3NT vs. invite than GIB's dealer. Or it could just be due to the number of hands you use versus GIB -- it uses only a few dozen because it has to make a decision in real time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible that your simulation uses somewhat different criteria for the hands that will jump directly to 3NT vs. invite than GIB's dealer. Or it could just be due to the number of hands you use versus GIB -- it uses only a few dozen because it has to make a decision in real time.

OK, yup - the criteria should be pretty straightforward in this instance, but if I have them right and it only simulates 30 hands, then there's about a 7% chance the results of its simulations will tell it the diamond is better. (That's using random sampling, though I presume GIB uses some form of importance sampling). So unlikely, but still large enough to happen regularly.

 

(Sorry frank0, will stop taking this thread off-topic now!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...