Jump to content

After 2C


wyman

Recommended Posts

http://bit.ly/2w8nWXJ

Two main beefs here:

1) When GIB bids 4H, he promises 3 but only has 2. I get that you have to fudge sometimes but we have suit agreement already in diamonds.

2) Seems terrible that we can't play diamonds after 4N, but this mostly goes back to the idea that GIB decided to fabricate a double fit and eschew the fit we've established.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure that once you have used RKC in one suit, you can't play in another suit. To play a slam in diamonds, I think (but not sure) that you have to jump to 6

 

Given the state of GIB bidding, this is probably better than playing in a cue bid but GIB has been know to pass cue bids so nothing is sure.

 

I would have rebid 2NT instead of 2 with a ratty 5 card suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get it. But not being able to play in a suit we've agreed is just bad. GIB should not bid 4H in the first place with this hand, which drove the rest of the problem.

 

 

I would have rebid 2NT instead of 2 with a ratty 5 card suit.

 

Appreciate it. However, dissecting my bids is missing the point of this forum entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appreciate it. However, dissecting my bids is missing the point of this forum entirely.

 

After X number of years, GIB doesn't seem to have made any major advances in bidding "judgement". There are a number of auctions you want to avoid because there is a good probability that GIB will cause a disaster (e.g. making a takeout double with a 1 suited hand too strong for a simple overcall). GIB does a lot better with NT openings (or NT rebids like I suggested) so playing to GIB's strengths is the best way to get good results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After X number of years, GIB doesn't seem to have made any major advances in bidding "judgement". There are a number of auctions you want to avoid because there is a good probability that GIB will cause a disaster (e.g. making a takeout double with a 1 suited hand too strong for a simple overcall). GIB does a lot better with NT openings (or NT rebids like I suggested) so playing to GIB's strengths is the best way to get good results.

 

Indeed. As I understood it, this forum is about illustrating places where GIB's judgment has gone awry, so that we aren't stuck with it forever :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get it. But not being able to play in a suit we've agreed is just bad. GIB should not bid 4H in the first place with this hand, which drove the rest of the problem.

 

 

 

 

Appreciate it. However, dissecting my bids is missing the point of this forum entirely.

The point of the forum is the help you overcome GIB's faults since BBO has no serious intention of working through even the most grievous of GIB's problems- only put a weak bandage on some small faults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point of the forum is the help you overcome GIB's faults since BBO has no serious intention of working through even the most grievous of GIB's problems- only put a weak bandage on some small faults.

Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...