Jump to content

Is this a proper definition?


lycier

Recommended Posts

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=lycier&s=SAJ7HJ75DA762CQT5&wn=Robot&w=ST63HQTDKJ83CJ963&nn=Robot&n=S854HA4DQT954CA84&en=Robot&e=SKQ92HK98632DCK72&d=s&v=b&b=7&a=1D(Minor%20suit%20opening%20--%203+%20%21D%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B)P2D!(Inverted%20minor%20suit%20raise%20--%204+%20%21D%3B%203-%20%21H%3B%203-%20%21S%3B%2010+%20HCP%3B%20forcing%20to%202N)D(Takeout%20double%20--%2013+%20total%20points)P3C(4+%20%21C%3B%209-%20total%20points)PPP&p=HAH6H5HTH4H9HJHQS6S4SKSAH7S3C4HKDQS2DAD3S7STS8S9D8D5C2D2SQSJC3S5C6CAC7C5C8CKCTCJH8CQDKD4D6DJD9H2C9DTH3D7]400|300[/hv]

 

East double says " Takeout double --- 13+ TPs ".

Is this definition proper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A take-out double is defined as something like 13+ TP with support for the unbid suits OR 17+ anything. OK this is oversimplified but you get my point.

 

GIB does not give explanations containing OR.

That's true, but precisely why this sounds like a buggy description. The same auction in hearts or spades, or a direct takeout of 1 of any suit, are all described as 13+ total points and shortness in the doubled suit (because GIB doesn't try to combine the strong hand distribution into the description with OR).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...