Jump to content

Double for penalties?


Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&w=sakj9ha3d984caj73&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=p2h(weak%2C%202-suiter)3d]133|200[/hv]

 

Pairs - local club.

 

Partner opens 2 showing a weak 2-suiter, 5-9HCP, five hearts and at least four in any other suit. Your agreement after the over-call is that double is for penalties.

 

What do you bid?

 

Are you happy playing penalty doubles in this auction? If not, how would you play the double? (take-out? game invite? Inquiry for second suit? values?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. I don't like X for penalties. It might work on this hand - and it could equally be disastrous too - but opportunities for takeout doubles occur far more frequently than penalty.

 

South has overcalled 3 vulnerable with a passed partner so beware.

 

As to what to bid on this hand, I'll let Nige1 do his bid-by-bid analysis. Even I'm not sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubling for penalties seems normal, esp after a second-seat preempt. I wouldn't dream of doing it on this hand. We have no surprises for S (or perhaps a good surprise when the preemptor shows up with the missing honour in his suit), and we have 4 defensive tricks opposite a hand that offered none. South (if competent) is hardly going to have made a vulnerable bid at the three level without either shortage or virtually all the missing (non-heart) points - xx xx AQJxxx KQx looks like a bare minimum, in which he's probably one off, and we're probably making 4.

 

So I'll just bid 4. If P has a generic xx KQJxxx xx xxx, it's on the spade finesse through the strong hand, and has extra chances if they lead a major (or a top club).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it seems almost unplayable to have this method without being able to ask for partners 2nd suit after inteference. I am concerned that we could have a game if not slam on with 3d untouchable or -1, but its difficult to know how to move forward without being able to find out vital information about partners hand.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it seems almost unplayable to have this method without being able to ask for partners 2nd suit after inteference. I am concerned that we could have a game if not slam on with 3d untouchable or -1, but its difficult to know how to move forward without being able to find out vital information about partners hand.

 

Exactly how I feel about the hand, too. I think maybe some of the problem lies with the opening mini Tartan-style bid having a 5 suit and possibly a 4 suit to accompany it, especially as shown here when the opponents overcall 3 of a minor. As far as I am aware, the original Tartan 5-5 2 opener was always 5/5m, never 5/5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...