Jump to content

Strong deck - part 3


  

15 members have voted

  1. 1. What now?

    • Pass
    • 4NT
      0
    • 5D
      0
    • 5H
      0
    • 5S
    • 5NT (GSF)
      0
    • 6S
    • 6NT
      0
    • Other
      0
    • Abstain
      0


Recommended Posts

 

Robot tourney, IMPs scoring. I decided to go low with 3NT. Now partner pulls to 4S, what now? You can assume that 4S over 2C would have been natural, and therefore bidding this way shows a hand too good to bid 4S. What now?

 

The assumption you make does not work well with GIB.(regarding the jump to 4 vs this one). I can imagine GIB bidding like this with something like KQJxxxxx Void xx Kxx.

I would pass unless in need of swing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was a club fit hopefully Gib would have cue bid 2D or pulled 3N to clubs.

any slam is hopeless unless spades are solid.

4N natural? even is probably not enough entries to take much tricks in spades

think you have no choice but to trust Gib and pass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part one is here

Part two is here

Robot tourney, IMPs scoring. I decided to go low with 3NT. Now partner pulls to 4S, what now? You can assume that 4S over 2C would have been natural, and therefore bidding this way shows a hand too good to bid 4S. What now?

I rank

  1. 5 = NAT. IMO this asks about trump solidity.
  2. 4N = RKC? But I suppose it could be NAT.
  3. Pass = NAT. Take the money.
  4. 6 = NAT. You have a bit to spare for your previous bidding and you never promised support.
  5. 6N = NAT. Might avoid a ruff; but If partner just has solid s, then you might not relish the post-mortem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of prematurely ending the debate, particularly on part 1:

 

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?bbo=y&lin=pn|manudude03,~~M3486,~~M3484,~~M3485|st%7C%7Cmd%7C4SH3JKAD67JKC568QA%2CSTH2469TD238TC279%2CS345789JQKAH58QDC%2C%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%202%7Csv%7Cn%7Cmb%7C1D%7Can%7CMinor%20suit%20opening%20--%203%2B%20%21D%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points%20%7Cmb%7C2C%7Can%7CTwo-level%20overcall%20--%205%2B%20%21C%3B%2010%2B%20HCP%3B%2011%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C3S%7Can%7C4%2B%20%21S%3B%2013%2B%20HCP%3B%2014%2B%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C3N%7Can%7C5%2B%20%21C%3B%204-%20%21H%3B%204-%20%21S%3B%2012%2B%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C4S%7Can%7C13%2B%20HCP%3B%20twice%20rebiddable%20%21S%3B%2014%2B%20total%20points%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cpc%7CH7%7Cpc%7CH3%7Cpc%7CHT%7Cpc%7CHQ%7Cmc%7C13%7C]399|300[/hv]

 

No-one even managed to get to 6, yet this had 15 top tricks. 4S+3 actually gained 1.44 imps when someone passed and then left in partner's reopening double, only to find 1D can't be touched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of prematurely ending the debate, particularly on part 1:

 

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?bbo=y&lin=pn|manudude03,~~M3486,~~M3484,~~M3485|st%7C%7Cmd%7C4SH3JKAD67JKC568QA%2CSTH2469TD238TC279%2CS345789JQKAH58QDC%2C%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%202%7Csv%7Cn%7Cmb%7C1D%7Can%7CMinor%20suit%20opening%20--%203%2B%20%21D%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points%20%7Cmb%7C2C%7Can%7CTwo-level%20overcall%20--%205%2B%20%21C%3B%2010%2B%20HCP%3B%2011%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C3S%7Can%7C4%2B%20%21S%3B%2013%2B%20HCP%3B%2014%2B%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C3N%7Can%7C5%2B%20%21C%3B%204-%20%21H%3B%204-%20%21S%3B%2012%2B%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C4S%7Can%7C13%2B%20HCP%3B%20twice%20rebiddable%20%21S%3B%2014%2B%20total%20points%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cpc%7CH7%7Cpc%7CH3%7Cpc%7CHT%7Cpc%7CHQ%7Cmc%7C13%7C]399|300[/hv]

 

No-one even managed to get to 6, yet this had 15 top tricks. 4S+3 actually gained 1.44 imps when someone passed and then left in partner's reopening double, only to find 1D can't be touched.

 

With my strong 2NT bid showing and at that vulnerability, my partner would have taken us to 6 with complete control of that suit like that.

 

EDIT: What did I win? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing the full hand it is obvious In retrospect that 1 would have worked best. This evening I overcalled on a similar chunky heart suit, with diamonds very much like the clubs on this hand. I voted in the original poll to make a 2-level overcall on the poorish 5-card suit, but... is partner going to advance with a 4-card heart suit?

 

Of course anything I say about warming to the 1 overcall cannot be trusted since I have seen the whole hand, especially because Cthonic will give partner Jxx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing the full hand it is obvious In retrospect that 1 would have worked best. This evening I overcalled on a similar chunky heart suit, with diamonds very much like the clubs on this hand. I voted in the original poll to make a 2-level overcall on the poorish 5-card suit, but... is partner going to advance with a 4-card heart suit?

 

Of course anything I say about warming to the 1 overcall cannot be trusted since I have seen the whole hand, especially because Cthonic will give partner Jxx.

 

With a self sufficient suit that can never be adequately conveyed to partner, why the mudane 3S, 4S? I would have splintered, and then bid spades, spades, and more spades until partner was convinced of my disregard for clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing the full hand it is obvious In retrospect that 1 would have worked best. This evening I overcalled on a similar chunky heart suit, with diamonds very much like the clubs on this hand. I voted in the original poll to make a 2-level overcall on the poorish 5-card suit, but... is partner going to advance with a 4-card heart suit?

 

Of course anything I say about warming to the 1 overcall cannot be trusted since I have seen the whole hand, especially because Cthonic will give partner Jxx.

 

Even in retrospect, my Unusual 2NT bid works if instead of Qxx in , partner had Jxx, or Kxx, or Kx in , or Jx in , or a host of other possibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even in retrospect, my Unusual 2NT bid works if instead of Qxx in , partner had Jxx, or Kxx, or Kx in , or Jx in , or a host of other possibilities.

 

The fact that you bid it with a 4-card suit (the major, no less) is going to lose a lot more in partnership trust than you gain on this hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that you bid it with a 4-card suit (the major, no less) is going to lose a lot more in partnership trust than you gain on this hand.

 

My father and I play Unusual 2NT, Michael's, etc. knowing that we could be as little as 4-4. It works well for us in key situations. We don't do it all the time, but we do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of prematurely ending the debate, particularly on part 1:

 

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?bbo=y&lin=pn|manudude03,~~M3486,~~M3484,~~M3485|st%7C%7Cmd%7C4SH3JKAD67JKC568QA%2CSTH2469TD238TC279%2CS345789JQKAH58QDC%2C%7Crh%7C%7Cah%7CBoard%202%7Csv%7Cn%7Cmb%7C1D%7Can%7CMinor%20suit%20opening%20--%203%2B%20%21D%3B%2011-21%20HCP%3B%2012-22%20total%20points%20%7Cmb%7C2C%7Can%7CTwo-level%20overcall%20--%205%2B%20%21C%3B%2010%2B%20HCP%3B%2011%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C3S%7Can%7C4%2B%20%21S%3B%2013%2B%20HCP%3B%2014%2B%20total%20points%3B%20forcing%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C3N%7Can%7C5%2B%20%21C%3B%204-%20%21H%3B%204-%20%21S%3B%2012%2B%20HCP%3B%2018-%20total%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7C4S%7Can%7C13%2B%20HCP%3B%20twice%20rebiddable%20%21S%3B%2014%2B%20total%20points%20%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cmb%7Cp%7Cpc%7CH7%7Cpc%7CH3%7Cpc%7CHT%7Cpc%7CHQ%7Cmc%7C13%7C]399|300[/hv]

 

No-one even managed to get to 6, yet this had 15 top tricks. 4S+3 actually gained 1.44 imps when someone passed and then left in partner's reopening double, only to find 1D can't be touched.

 

North had exactly the hand I pictured based on the bidding :rolleyes:

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My father and I play Unusual 2NT, Michael's, etc. knowing that we could be as little as 4-4. It works well for us in key situations. We don't do it all the time, but we do.

 

Does it work because you don't disclose it adequately?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really thought that was deleted by a moderator, didn't you?

I deleted it myself and all it said was "Nobody is hating you or your 8 card 2 NT suggestions"

 

You're amlost to the point where you're uncoachable. We never want to be that. I learn something new every day. We NEVER know it all. We have to accept those boundaries, or we are nothing more than animals. I believe we are MUCH smarter, and never came from apes, and we certainly have a "Higher Purpose", to which I have yet to fully determine. If you want to rationally talk numbers, Let's Go. If you want to belittle me for every complex assumption I post on a low traffic message board? You are talking Chinese and we will never see eye to eye. I'm gonna need that because I know I am destined for greatness at this Game.

 

Just be respectful SLIGHTLY, so we can have an open and honest disagreement is all I ask. When I am here, I am absorbing all information given to me through everyone's posts, studying, weeding out theories I believe are flat out wrong with no subject for debate, moving on to some of yours and other knowledgeable posters' posts, and better myself every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...