Jump to content

Challenge event 9 information/score


frank0

Recommended Posts

4th set: Mkgnao - ntchai 22-25

 

http://webutil.bridgebase.com/v2/tview.php?t=ARDCHALLENGE:812446ae.59f0.11e7.be39.0cc47a39aeb4-1498427515&u=Mkgnao

 

I think this format is really bad. IMPs is not a good choice, since GIB is unable to bid reasonably. And if you combine IMPs with non-best hand, then you are constantly playing boring partscores for washes. At least playing MPs, you can make a difference on every board in your cardplay and playing best hand IMPs, you get a lot of games so more boards are interesting.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this format is really bad. IMPs is not a good choice, since GIB is unable to bid reasonably. And if you combine IMPs with non-best hand, then you are constantly playing boring partscores for washes. At least playing MPs, you can make a difference on every board in your cardplay and playing best hand IMPs, you get a lot of games so more boards are interesting.

Why would best hand make more games? It doesn't change the total points in the partnership, it just puts the biggest hand south. What it does mean is that when there's a game, it's usually by NS rather than EW, unless the game is based on extreme distribution.

 

I don't mind it. Sometimes best-hand feels like cheating, since it gives such a big clue about the HCP distributions during the bidding and play. It's nice trying to have real auctions where partner can be strong, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would best hand make more games? It doesn't change the total points in the partnership, it just puts the biggest hand south. What it does mean is that when there's a game, it's usually by NS rather than EW, unless the game is based on extreme distribution.

 

It does, since GIB is a timid bidder and he virtually always has a maximum for his bidding. So if you have the best hand at the table and partner is max for his bidding you will play more games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does, since GIB is a timid bidder and he virtually always has a maximum for his bidding. So if you have the best hand at the table and partner is max for his bidding you will play more games.

That's not my experience, GIB frequently jumps to game with hands I would have invited with. The most common is 1-1NT-2-4 -- usually this is 11 HCP and 5 hearts, which is fine, but I've frequently seem him do it with only 4. Or 1-1NT-2-4 -- this should be a limit raise with 3-card support, but he sometimes does it with just 2.

 

Anyway, it's hard to please everyone, which is why we change formats for each event. But I think in most of the threads where we've discussed formats, the concensus has been that best hand is an adulturated form of bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this format is really bad. IMPs is not a good choice, since GIB is unable to bid reasonably. And if you combine IMPs with non-best hand, then you are constantly playing boring partscores for washes. At least playing MPs, you can make a difference on every board in your cardplay and playing best hand IMPs, you get a lot of games so more boards are interesting.

I think the main problem with non-best hand is that GIB is awful at constructive bidding with good hands if there is competition. Hence it is percentage to make wild overcalls with very weak hands, which also leads to random results.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 Smerriman vs 22 (43) Mbodell

 

Q1 mbodell 30 (30) smerriman 11 (11), +19 net in quarter, +19 net overall. Hands http://webutil.bridgebase.com/v2/tview.php?t=ARDCHALLENGE:c129ae02.5ae4.11e7.be39.0cc47a39aeb4-1498532419&u=Mbodell.

 

A good first quarter for both of us IMO with 11/16 push boards.

 

BTW, from the other thread I'm very pro the non-best hand setting and mildly pro-IMPs.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

R32 Nige1 v Barmar

S1: 3 - 31 = -28

S2: 32 - 29 = 3

S3: 31 - 4 = 27

S4: 36 - 5 = 31

Nige1 won by 33 imps.

Thank you for the game, Barmar

I shouldn't play these things in the middle of the night. I really got caught speeding on S3 board 9, then lost track of the cards that had been played (I couldn't remember if the K was good) so I went down 5 instead of 3, costing 8 IMPs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I shouldn't play these things in the middle of the night. I really got caught speeding on S3 board 9, then lost track of the cards that had been played (I couldn't remember if the K was good) so I went down 5 instead of 3, costing 8 IMPs.

 

I'm the same way. You'd like to think you can play your A game when the tube is and you're answering emails in another window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...