diana_eva Posted May 15, 2017 Report Share Posted May 15, 2017 I split redspawn's example hand and follow up discussion to a separate thread here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aguahombre Posted May 15, 2017 Report Share Posted May 15, 2017 I split redspawn's example hand and follow up discussion to a separate thread here.I was thinking of a better place to put it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSpawn Posted May 17, 2017 Report Share Posted May 17, 2017 That's silly. You really want partner to sit with something like: void♠QJTxxx♥Qxxxxx♦x♣ Of course you don't. Yes, 99% of the time, partner is going to sit for it. If you preempt, you generally never bid again unless partner forces you to. But there are oddball exceptions to every "rule" in bridge. Mike Here is part of the problem. A weak 2 bid used to be narrowly defined so your partner will have a quick "snapshot" of your hand much like a crisp, clean strong 1NT bid describing a balanced hand with 15-17 HCP. However, that picture becomes fuzzy once again when you try to attach a void suit and a 5 card minor suit as a possibility to what was once narrowly defined. K&R rates this hand as perfectly average at 9.90 points (given distribution) and I will buy that. That makes this hand perfectly average with nothing interesting to report yet, but I have this feeling that once partner comes alive, your hand's value with shoot through the roof. There are times you need to jam up your opponents and there are other times that you need to let nature take its course. Let nature takes it course. Let your partner in on the fun and do not preemptively rob him of the chance to describe his hand by force fitting a weak 2 bid for this 6-6-1-0 hand. This hand is so distributional that it has that 6-5+ freakish thing going on so you can start doing some nice things after you pass 1st round. Let your partner do his job 1st. If partner decides to pass, have a little fun with this hand afterwards -- you definitely have the distribution to give the opponents a run for their money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyr Posted May 18, 2017 Report Share Posted May 18, 2017 Here is part of the problem. A weak 2 bid used to be narrowly defined so your partner will have a quick "snapshot" of your hand much like a crisp, clean strong 1NT bid describing a balanced hand with 15-17 HCP. However, that picture becomes fuzzy once again when you try to attach a void suit and a 5 card minor suit as a possibility to what was once narrowly defined. K&R rates this hand as perfectly average at 9.90 points (given distribution) and I will buy that. That makes this hand perfectly average with nothing interesting to report yet, but I have this feeling that once partner comes alive, your hand's value with shoot through the roof. There are times you need to jam up your opponents and there are other times that you need to let nature take its course. Let nature takes it course. Let your partner in on the fun and do not preemptively rob him of the chance to describe his hand by force fitting a weak 2 bid for this 6-6-1-0 hand. This hand is so distributional that it has that 6-5+ freakish thing going on so you can start doing some nice things after you pass 1st round. Let your partner do his job 1st. If partner decides to pass, have a little fun with this hand afterwards -- you definitely have the distribution to give the opponents a run for their money. Definitely an average hand with nothing interesting to report. Passing and then acting after partner passes will be anything but fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts