JLilly Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 I think it's critical to know how tight partner is with weak-two bids when vulnerable. And how much having a void and/or a four-or-five-card side-suit affects their calculus. And, not knowing partner individually, guessing based on the community of players from which partner was drawn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 I think it's critical to know how tight partner is with weak-two bids when vulnerable. And how much having a void and/or a four-or-five-card side-suit affects their calculus. And, not knowing partner individually, guessing based on the community of players from which partner was drawn. Agree. It might also be helpful to know with what kind of hand East is likely to protect. At pairs, players tend to be less disciplined, so your decision does hinge on your assessment of probabilities, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamJson Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 Trying to predict what will happen at other tables, and particularly assuming that they will all be the same, can be a mugs game. Yes, if everyone else is making 2H then you need to double 2S, but the chances are that they are not. Some may not open partner's hand, or may open 1H, or 3H. Others might overcall 3S, or double. In partscore situations like this a plus score is king so I feel that getting 2S one off will be fine, maybe not 100% but well above average. Clearly 2S doubled making will be a zero. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveMoe Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 PASS^2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 We can't give RHO a free shot at 2S. I'd rather bid 3H than pass. 110 vs 100 /200 looks like a realistic outcome and we have a score to protect. Could partner have KQJxxx and out? But he might have some other assorted goodies that make us a lock for a set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr1303 Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 If you never concede a doubled contract, you aren't doubling enough. I double 2S. I've been wrong before. I expect 1 off to be mostly likely, with 2 off possible if partner has a fair hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mlbridge Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 Pass first go around. After the 2S overcall, I would double for penalty if my pard is conservative and I can expect some values in the other two suits. If my pard is aggressive and plays hand well, I would bid 3H. My 10 of hearts may help out. If my pard is weak, I would pass and take my chances at setting 2S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nabooba Posted April 17, 2017 Report Share Posted April 17, 2017 First round is a clear pass. You don't have a heart fit. Where are your tricks on offense. If partner makes normal weak 2 bids, second round is a X at MPs (never at IMPs). 2H will make more often than not. If partner has the Ah, you are looking at 6 tricks. If he doesn't, then he ought to have something outside H for you. In any event, 2S rates to go down, so you have to X to get +200 instead of +100. If partner makes undisciplined weak 2 bids in first seat, then you are stuck guessing. And as noted above, in IMPs this is entirely different. Then you have two clear passes. +100 is just as good as +110; -670 is disaster. Cheers,Mike "If partner has the Ah, you are looking at 6 tricks"Uh where?AH, 2S and maybe a H ruff, AC and where is the 6th defensive trick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JLilly Posted April 20, 2017 Report Share Posted April 20, 2017 Would partner ever open 2M with four cards in the other M? If they did what would that mean? Randos on BBO, I'd assume 2M just meant 6 cards and not enough for 1M and too much for P. This kind of hand makes me sympathetic to Muiderberg and other 5-card weak-two treatments that are scarce in North America, even if those conventions don't solve the problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts