Jump to content

What do you bid?


Winstonm

Recommended Posts

This is a tough question, Am I playing SAYC or 2/1 GF. Is this Matchpoints or imps. Do I have a way to get back into hearts if I raise clubs here or are all new suit bids attempts at slam or 3NT? Does 2 promise five?

 

If 2 was 'game force" I will bid 2 then raise clubs. I like 2 for a couple of reasons. First, I reserve 3 immediately to show extra values. This hand lacks that (but nice distributional value). Second, once again as in the other thread, I live in hearts (AKJ really needs to be mentioned). So my bidding plan here is to bid hearts then raise clubs. Likely auctions..

 

1S - 2C - 2H - 2N - 3C (perfect one in my mind)

1S - 2C - 2H - 3N - pass (ok, I use 3NT as weaker than 2NT in GF auction

1S - 2C - 2H - 2S - 3C (complete picture, two suit agreement for blackwood)

1S - 2C -2H -3D - 4C (complete picture, this is real "support" else not bid past 3N

 

All these club raises are limited by the failure to raise immediately.

 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2H.

 

Bidding my shape.

 

Since 2C promises a rebid, I can complete

my description with a delayed raise of clubs,

besides 2C may only be a 4 cards suit.

 

For me the raise would force to game, so a raise

is out of the question, unless 2C already forces to

game.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible to use the immediate raise to show two types of hands? Either I hold extra values or I hold shape. If I raise clubs, I can still find hearts at the three level; however, if I bid hearts and pard bids 3D, clubs are lost unless I wish to bypass 3NT. Does anyone see this as a potential problem? Thanks.

 

WinstonM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible to use the immediate raise to show two types of hands? Either I hold extra values or I hold shape. If I raise clubs, I can still find hearts at the three level; however, if I bid hearts and pard bids 3D, clubs are lost unless I wish to bypass 3NT. Does anyone see this as a potential problem? Thanks.

 

WinstonM

3D?? On going question does it promises real D or just 4th suit, unclear direction, concern over D stoppers?

 

I prefer case 2 but in either case I am now bidding 4Clubs, I love my hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
also 2H for me. Pretty easy. More economical to describing my hand, plus why would i want to raise on xxx immediately anyways? pard could easily have 4 clubs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bid 2.

 

It is unlikley to be wrong to make the cheaper bid if it also shows a significant feature of your hand.

 

The only problem I can see is if responder is able to rebid a non-forcing 3. Now we might belong in 3, 5, 3NT (or possibly even 4M), and would have no way to investigate. But bidding an immediate 3 doesn't really solve that problem anyway - it just transfers it to partner!

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some points here I think worth mentioning.

 

First, assuming 2/1 G.F., there are two auctions that become problematic with a 2H rebid. First is if partner follows with 3C - most play this cancels the G.F. in a non-fit auction. However, an immediate raise of clubs would create a force to 3N or 4 of a minor if 3N is unplayable. I'd hate to guess what to do over his 3c if he held A, xxx, xxx, KQJ9xx or xx, Qx, xxx, AKQxxx. I would expect to reach 5 clubs much more easily on either hand after an initial raise.

 

Second problem is if partner bids 3D as fourth suit forcing. Now, unless I bypass 3N I cannot show the club support and partner does not have to have a slam try hand for this bid: Ax, xxx, xxx, AKJxx would do. A 2H rebid now makes life very awkward for me when he follows with 3D. On this hand we would land on our feet in 4S, but what if partner bid instead of 3D chose 3N on Ax, Qxx, Qxx, AKJxx?

 

Lastly, is it really so much of a concern if partner has 4 clubs only? If so, he must have some type of balanced or semi-balanced hand and is looking for the best strain. Most of the time that he bids 2C on a 4-bagger he will then either support spades on his next bid or bid some number of NT. If he has 4 hearts, he can bid those as well.

 

I'm not claiming that 3C is a better bid than 2H, but I do see it as a lot closer than it appears and not at all a poor or wrong choice.

 

WinstonM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand either of your problems, WinstonM. If you are willing to force to 4m with an immediate 3 raise opposite a not game-forcing 2 bid, you can bid on over 3 as well (with 3 e.g.). If partner bids 3, what is wrong with bidding 4? You have described your hand well, and partner, having forced to game, will be well placed to make the final decision. (Certainly bypassing 3NT cannot be a worry opposite a partner that asks for a diamond stopper).

 

Arend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If 2 is not game force, it can't promise 5: what would partner do with a ballanced 11 points, then? Ok, in Lawrence's system 1NT would be 6-11 and 2 is either almost GF with 6+ clubs or GF with usually 5+. But even then you should bid 2 now, the only issue being if you would pass responder's next 3 bid.

 

Playing standard, you have to bid 2 now and pass responder's next 2NT bid. But fortunately he will bid 2 or 3 more often. Btw, 3 from responder after your 2 is forcing in Biedermeijer. In SAYC as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the alternative to 2 I wonder. When did partner promise 5 clubs? And even if he did, what's the rush? I would bid 2 on 5404 too. It's forcing in any system I know.

 

3 would show 5-4 and deny 4 hearts. On rare occasions the raise can be on 3 cards, but then it's unsuitable for a 2NT rebid. This hand for example:

 

AQJ65

82

A95

K106

 

If we belong in NT, we will get there after 3 from partner. Minors we bid, we only play there reluctantly, unless it's at slam level - alternatively, if partner has a small doubleton heart too, and not 2 spades.

 

8

J9

KQ104

AQJ874

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2H is completely right. I play that a raise to 3C shows a better hand than this. Either a stronger hand generally or better club support. Taking a delayed raise to 3C is a much better way of doing it.

 

In addition, I play that 1S 2C 2H 3C is still 100% GF. But then I still play old-school style invitational jump shifts.

 

If opener holds:

 

Ax

Qxx

Qxx

AKJxx

 

he shouldn't jump to 3NT after 2H. A simple (forcing) 2NT is ample here. 1) Opener could be 5-5 in the majors, in which case 4H looks best, 2) partner could hold Qxx in clubs, in which case 6 C looks best, 3) partner might have a 6th spade, in which case 4S looks best. The whole idea behind playing 2/1 GF is not to jump to 3NT unless you're certain it's the best contract. With this hand, auction should go:

 

1S 2C

2H 2NT

3C 3S

4D 5C, might try 4S at matchpoints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B)

 

Trixie is confused by this question and some of the responses to it. She does not even know anyone (except her first husband Elmer, and he couldn't play a lick) who would bid 3C playing any system at any form of scoring. My goodness, you don't even have a club honor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...