Kungsgeten Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 I think I've read somewhere (probably here or at BridgeWinners) about some clever way of showing two-suiters over (1♠)-pass-(2♠). Does anyone have a link (been searching, but can not find it)? I guess the most common way is to play 2NT as minors, and with hearts + minor you need to make something up. I think the suggested method was something like this, but I'm not sure: (1♠)-pass-(2♠)---Dbl = Take-out or both minors. Advancer bids 2NT with a preference for hearts.2NT = Hearts + minor. Advancer can bid 3C as p/c. Not sure if this is what I read though, and if it is then you have to give up 2NT as Lebensohl/Scrambling or whatever you play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wank Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 just play 2nt as hearts and a minor and x as take out. 3S is minors if you ever get dealt it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broze Posted April 10, 2017 Report Share Posted April 10, 2017 Yes 2NT is Michael's for me. Worth adding that we can double with 1=4=2=6 as well and then 2NT by responder asks. Minors is fairly rare so as wank says 3S will do for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinDIP Posted April 25, 2017 Report Share Posted April 25, 2017 I think I've read somewhere (probably here or at BridgeWinners) about some clever way of showing two-suiters over (1♠)-pass-(2♠). Does anyone have a link (been searching, but can not find it)? I guess the most common way is to play 2NT as minors, and with hearts + minor you need to make something up. I think the suggested method was something like this, but I'm not sure: (1♠)-pass-(2♠)---Dbl = Take-out or both minors. Advancer bids 2NT with a preference for hearts.2NT = Hearts + minor. Advancer can bid 3C as p/c. Not sure if this is what I read though, and if it is then you have to give up 2NT as Lebensohl/Scrambling or whatever you play. Search for Kit Woolsey as he is the one who advocates playing 2N as showing a two-suiter with diamonds and (IIRC) a 2N response to a t/o X as showing primary D. (He uses the same method over 4♠.) It was intriguing but I decided playing 2N (and 4N) as Michaels was easier and better including because anchoring to the highest-ranked unbid suit seems more effective if there is further competition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.