Jump to content

Dummy revoked


nige1

Recommended Posts

I agree with Sven on this one, provided the designatiion was specifically "ace of hearts" or "heart ace" in compliance with Law 46A. If his designation was something like "top heart" then he's called, albeit unknowingly, for the ten of hearts — and that call will stand, establishing the revoke. But there is no ace of hearts in dummy, so the call is void — it didn't happen. Since it didn't happen, the revoke is not established.

I posed the question on the EBL TDs forum where arguments in both directions were presented. However, the secretary of the WBFLC has just pointed out that in the new laws the word "void" has been removed and "invalid" is used instead. I imagine that will clarify things quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posed the question on the EBL TDs forum where arguments in both directions were presented. However, the secretary of the WBFLC has just pointed out that in the new laws the word "void" has been removed and "invalid" is used instead. I imagine that will clarify things quite a bit.

In answer to my question he has now posted on the EBL forum:

I am hopeful that the use of the word 'invalid' might encourage Directors to believe that an incomplete designation is sufficient to establish a revoke.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In answer to my question he has now posted on the EBL forum:

I am hopeful that the use of the word 'invalid' might encourage Directors to believe that an incomplete designation is sufficient to establish a revoke.

Obviously it should:

A void action is one that was (considered) never made while an invalid action was certainly made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously it should:

A void action is one that was (considered) never made while an invalid action was certainly made.

 

void (noun) relates to emptiness

(verb) relates to canceling or vacate (the use you allude to)

 

As such, without adequate modification, your use does not include the effects of a time machine- and it would be dubious for contestants (as well as tournament officials) to so believe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

void (noun) relates to emptiness

(verb) relates to canceling or vacate (the use you allude to)

 

As such, without adequate modification, your use does not include the effects of a time machine- and it would be dubious for contestants (as well as tournament officials) to so believe

"Void" as used in 2007 Law 46 B 4 is an adjective! (Neither noun nor verb)

 

According to my Webster it means that the described action has no effect or result - "it does not exist"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As laudable as not wanting to give UI is ................ what kind of UI do you give when dummy comes down and you say "Isn't that the Ace of Diamonds?"

I guess his thinking is that his partner would realize that he noticed it because he could see the "duplicate" card in his hand.

 

Yeah, sounds like a lame excuse to me, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...