Jinksy Posted December 17, 2016 Report Share Posted December 17, 2016 I don't think there's a moral to this, but it was an entertaining hand: [hv=pc=n&s=sakqt86h9djt872c3&w=s9753hat76543d5c2&n=sj2hq2daq94ckj984&e=s4hkj8dk63caqt765&d=e&v=e&b=6&a=1c1sp1n2c2d4hpp4sdppr5hdppp]399|300[/hv] IMP pairs. The actual sequence after 4♠ was X P P lead facedown, XX by S on the principle that no-one was going to deprive him of his rightful call. West was a pro, whose double can be explained by him being about 5 whiskies into the evening. North had no idea whether either his 1N or X were correct, but didn't want to be left out of the entertainment. Both 4♠ and 5♥ were making, so South's redouble was one of the more costly actions I've seen in the history of bridge (especially if you count N's double as one of the consequences). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmnka447 Posted December 17, 2016 Report Share Posted December 17, 2016 I think North's hand is too strong for a 1 NT advance. I think the two bids North should consider are either 2 NT or 2 ♣. North does have a 13 count and 2 QTs. ♥ also could be a problem at NT, so I'd lean towards a 2 ♣ advance to see what partner says. Once North does that there's less pressure to make a "make up" double of 5 ♥. South let emotion get the better of him/her because of a minor irregularity. I'd be delighted to be playing 4 ♠x with that hand. As a corollary to passing when you know the opponents are in a bad contract so they can't run, when you're in a good spot, one shouldn't do anything that may let the opponents push you out of it. 4 ♠ making rates to be an IMP winner. Good hand and story though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.