How Do You Fix This?

[cherdano]

Campaign funding is overrated.

[barmar]

Wouldn't equal public-purse funding of candidates help? That would put the kibosh on private funding if not private support because then it would be clearly a bribe and easier to prosecute as such.

SCOTUS has deemed campaign contributions to be exercise of the right to free speech, and Citizens United has declared that corporations have the same right to this as individuals.

 

So it would probably take a constitutional amendment to get rid of private funding. That's a lot to expect of a gridlocked Congress being asked to enact something against their own interests.

[Al_U_Card]

SCOTUS has deemed campaign contributions to be exercise of the right to free speech, and Citizens United has declared that corporations have the same right to this as individuals.

 

So it would probably take a constitutional amendment to get rid of private funding. That's a lot to expect of a gridlocked Congress being asked to enact something against their own interests.

Heaven forbid that the Congress actually do something in the interest of the people.... but they can ram through harming legislation like the Patriot act and giving Bush the right to attack at will. (Just point the Army and shoot, as per Homer J. Simpson) As for the corporations versus the individual, just try dissolving an individual to see just how different they are.

[barmar]

Heaven forbid that the Congress actually do something in the interest of the people....

That's the point of this whole thread, isn't it? They're no longer statesmen acting on behalf of the people, they're career politicians acting on behalf of themselves and their parties.

[hrothgar]

SCOTUS has deemed campaign contributions to be exercise of the right to free speech, and Citizens United has declared that corporations have the same right to this as individuals.

 

So it would probably take a constitutional amendment to get rid of private funding. That's a lot to expect of a gridlocked Congress being asked to enact something against their own interests.

 

It's so cute that you think that Stare Decisis has any relevance any more

 

For example, I hope that the new Supreme Court shows all the same respect towards Heller that the Roberts Court showed towards Miller...

 

Those that live by the sword shall die by the sword.

[Winstonm]

Howard Baker famously asked: What did the President know and when did he know it? about the Watergate investigation. I cannot imagine any Republican senator of today having the integrity to ask such a question of their own party's President. Today, the fingers would all be pointing across the isle.

 

That is not a money or campaign finance issue - that is an ideological (read: faith) issue. We have to understand and accept that a large part (40%?) of the Republican Party is the equivalent to an American Taliban with no room within their belief system for compromise.

 

As an aside, here in Tulsa the other day the Nazarene Church (the denomination in which I was reared) had a sign posted that read: When compromise trumps truth, we are toast. How utterly absurd to think one's subjective beliefs constitute a truth monopoly. No wonder so many Republicans sound more like t.v. evangelists that statesmen when they come from such a self-righteous reservoir.

 

While on the rant, let me say also that MSNBC sucks - it is trying to outfox Fox from a progressive stance which is antipathy to the stance it proclaims to project.

 

And Hillary, it is not enough to simply repeat, When they go low, we go high; you have to live it. When Anderson Cooper asked you about the Donald Trump video and audio, you should have shown us how to take the high road by saying something like this: "That kind of discussion has no place in a Presidential debate. The American people saw and heard what was said. I trust the judgement of the American people. They do not need me to tell them what to think."

 

Rant end:

[Al_U_Card]

That's the point of this whole thread, isn't it? They're no longer statesmen acting on behalf of the people, they're career politicians acting on behalf of themselves and their parties.

Did they ever? The point is more what can be done to impede their malfeasance.

One thing would be to eliminate lobbyists and to find ways to limit corporate/special interest influence.

[kenberg]

Related to "What can be done" I offer a piece in WaPo today

Kasich speaks in favor of the TPP. Without worrying (for the moment) about whether he is right or wrong, I fantasize. Had he been the nominee, possibly we would be discussing such matters instead of discussing groping, Miss Piggy, and "Mexican judges" born in Indiana.

 

We will not be changing to a proportional system of representation. But maybe we could at least try to nominate someone who is not a total embarrassment to us all? Yes I know HC is not perfect. But "not perfect" falls woefully short in describing DT.

[barmar]

Did they ever? The point is more what can be done to impede their malfeasance.

There was a time when they could come to compromises and pass bills like Social Security, the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, and Welfare Reform. Passing Obamacare was like pulling teeth, it was incredibly degraded from what the proponents wanted, and they still repeatedly take pro forma votes to repeal it.

[Al_U_Card]

There was a time when they could come to compromises and pass bills like Social Security, the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, and Welfare Reform. Passing Obamacare was like pulling teeth, it was incredibly degraded from what the proponents wanted, and they still repeatedly take pro forma votes to repeal it.

That says more about the designs of their masters than anything else. The influence and control of legislators has to be stopped before it becomes nothing more than a rubber-stamp for the corporate cleptocracy.

[blackshoe]

And Hillary, it is not enough to simply repeat, When they go low, we go high; you have to live it. When Anderson Cooper asked you about the Donald Trump video and audio, you should have shown us how to take the high road by saying something like this: "That kind of discussion has no place in a Presidential debate. The American people saw and heard what was said. I trust the judgement of the American people. They do not need me to tell them what to think."

I'm not at all sure Hilary believes that last bit.

[barmar]

There's a new TV show, "Designated Survivor", in which a bomb destroyed the Capitol building during the State of the Union, killing the President, VP, and all but 3 members of Congress and the Cabinet. The titular character is a lone cabinet member who is traditionally sequestered during the speech, so that someone in the line of succession would be alive if this ever happened. I wonder if the creators had this same question in mind, and thought that starting from scratch might be the only way.

 

Was Congress this divisive during Reconstruction? We did get through that.

[Al_U_Card]

Perhaps the bomb was planted by the DNC operatives while they were waiting for their next chance to incite violence at a Trump rally?

 

Interesting revelations but nothing surprising really. They learned from RMN and just took it from there...

 

Meanwhile, we can fix the hot mess by stopping terrorism. How to? Stop being terrorists. I realize that this goes against the natural tendency of imperialist war-mongers that see every terrestrial locale as a potential target and every non-US instigated movement as a threat to national security but... someone has to stop the ball rolling and the guy with the biggest balls is usually the best one to start.

[Zelandakh]

Perhaps the bomb was planted by the DNC operatives while they were waiting for their next chance to incite violence at a Trump rally?

 

Interesting revelations but nothing surprising really. They learned from RMN and just took it from there...

 

Meanwhile, we can fix the hot mess by stopping terrorism. How to? Stop being terrorists. I realize that this goes against the natural tendency of imperialist war-mongers that see every terrestrial locale as a potential target and every non-US instigated movement as a threat to national security but... someone has to stop the ball rolling and the guy with the biggest balls is usually the best one to start.

You really live in a complete fantasy bubble don't you? :blink:

[mike777]

As I mentioned before there seems to be an increase in fear, an increase in anxiety.

 

I understand there have been over 3000 shooting in my old hometown of Chicago, many in my old neighborhood of Pullman/Roseland where I grew up. I hear reports of a massive heroin/opiate problem that is growing in this country. Many are dying from overdose.

 

In my current hometown there was a riot where one person was murdered. On my very quiet tiny block last week, 3 houses down, there was an attempted break in during the day. NO one was home and the alarm scared them away. This week 3 houses down the other direction a homeless person was found living in an empty house up for sale. About an hour ago the woman next door to me called the police when 2 unknown men came to her door during daylight and knocked, yes they only knocked and she grew so afraid she called the cops. The men were long gone by the time the police came but the point being they did nothing but knock.

 

 

I just wonder if other posters note an increase of fear and anxiety in their home town?

 

---

 

 

btw that bombing was about 2/3 hours north of where i live, no leads have been released.

[Winstonm]

As I mentioned before there seems to be an increase in fear, an increase in anxiety.

 

I understand there have been over 3000 shooting in my old hometown of Chicago, many in my old neighborhood of Pullman/Roseland where I grew up. I hear reports of a massive heroin/opiate problem that is growing in this country. Many are dying from overdose.

 

In my current hometown there was a riot where one person was murdered. On my very quiet tiny block last week, 3 houses down, there was an attempted break in during the day. NO one was home and the alarm scared them away. This week 3 houses down the other direction a homeless person was found living in an empty house up for sale. About an hour ago the woman next door to me called the police when 2 unknown men came to her door during daylight and knocked, yes they only knocked and she grew so afraid she called the cops. The men were long gone by the time the police came but the point being they did nothing but knock.

 

 

I just wonder if other posters note an increase of fear and anxiety in their home town?

 

---

 

 

btw that bombing was about 2/3 hours north of where i live, no leads have been released.

 

According to the Trump's crumbling polling numbers, the idea of Donald Trump in the White House seems to be causing a lot of fear and anxiety. B-)

[Kaitlyn S]

Why can't I give positive reputation to barmar's post?

[barmar]

Why can't I give positive reputation to barmar's post?

We don't allow voting on admins.

[mike777]

Although this https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/1c28bc3a-2b7a-3bd6-8c40-2ac796904fc0/ss_republican-party-could.html is a joke, there is the question: what has happened to statesmanship? Is it possible to have a democratic republic where opposing sides are considered the enemy and compromise treason?

 

What steps are needed to correct these problems?

 

 

I think the problem is overstated. "I think it dramatically overstates the depth of the polarization, and the impossibility of reform."

 

Strong Presidential leadership would go a long way to "correct these problems".

[barmar]

"Studio 360" this weekend re-aired a show they did a few years ago about the Lincoln Memorial, and how it has been involved in many historical events (e.g. Marion Anderson's performance in 1939, Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech). Naturally, the show included a few quotes from Lincoln himself, including the Gettysburg Address.

 

I can't imagine any modern politician being able to move me like these people. It just doesn't seem possible these days for people like this to get elected in the first place. You want people with great integrity, but it seems like you need to sell your soul to get through the process of campaigning. "Mr Smith" can't go to Washington now.

[awm]

I can't imagine any modern politician being able to move me like these people. It just doesn't seem possible these days for people like this to get elected in the first place. You want people with great integrity, but it seems like you need to sell your soul to get through the process of campaigning. "Mr Smith" can't go to Washington now.

 

I've been quite impressed with President Obama in this respect. Besides being a magnificent speaker, his personal ethics and family life are beyond reproach (contrast with Bill Clinton for example) and his administration has been remarkably scandal-free compared to previous administrations (yes, Republicans in congress can always manufacture something, but there has been really no evidence). This is part of the reason Hillary Clinton is a disappointing candidate for many democrats -- it's not that she is truly corrupt or a bad person, but she's very much "politics as usual" compared to our current president. And she's really not an inspiring speaker (by her own admission). Given her expertise in "working the system" she may well be a more effective president than Barack Obama (who seemed handicapped by a naive idea that the Republicans would negotiate in good faith for most of his first term), and she's surely better than the lunatic the other side has nominated (or the incompetents the third parties have put up). We'll miss our current president when he is gone (and this may be part of why his approval ratings are soaring in the last year of his administration).

[Winstonm]

I've been quite impressed with President Obama in this respect. Besides being a magnificent speaker, his personal ethics and family life are beyond reproach (contrast with Bill Clinton for example) and his administration has been remarkably scandal-free compared to previous administrations (yes, Republicans in congress can always manufacture something, but there has been really no evidence). This is part of the reason Hillary Clinton is a disappointing candidate for many democrats -- it's not that she is truly corrupt or a bad person, but she's very much "politics as usual" compared to our current president. And she's really not an inspiring speaker (by her own admission). Given her expertise in "working the system" she may well be a more effective president than Barack Obama (who seemed handicapped by a naive idea that the Republicans would negotiate in good faith for most of his first term), and she's surely better than the lunatic the other side has nominated (or the incompetents the third parties have put up). We'll miss our current president when he is gone (and this may be part of why his approval ratings are soaring in the last year of his administration).

 

I quite agree with this assessment and might add that Hillary Clinton may well turn out to be more in the line of a Lyndon Johnson-type president, surely as tough but with not as much political ammunition as Johnson had at his disposal to force his will.

[barmar]

Yes, I agree that Obama is about the cleanest, most respectable politician we've seen in years, and I admire him greatly. Unfortunately, he was relatively ineffective at making significant changes. His signature legislation was Obamacare, and it's greatly watered down from what it should have been. If being able to bridge the partisan divide and bring about compromise is the mark of a good politician, then I suppose it was successful, but I can't help but feel that giving up so much makes this a weak victory. His other main legacy was that we killed Bin Laden under his watch, but I think that's mainly a testament to our military and intelligence organizations, and it was just a matter of time, not specifically related to his administration.

[onoway]

I think Michelle Obama is a very powerful speaker, and quite a few people have said they really wished it was her name on the ballot. I haven't listened to all of her speeches for sure, but the ones I've heard have been truly excellent. Elizabeth Warren seems to cut to the chase as well, both of them seem far more engaging to listen to than Clinton.

[Zelandakh]

I think Michelle Obama is a very powerful speaker, and quite a few people have said they really wished it was her name on the ballot.

Give it 20 years and maybe it will be, at least if they decide to follow the Clinton model. B-)