nige1 Posted September 14, 2016 Report Share Posted September 14, 2016 I accept that Justin Lall and Gonzalo Goded are ethical and above criticism. Please treat these opinions, in that context. The problem is over-sophisticated Bridge rules and sloppy enforcement,. The WBF have a regulation forbidding an undisclosed agreement to open a 1-bid with a king below average. Many pairs regularly open 3rd in hand, with such hands. If this occurs often enough in a regular partnership, they are likely to have an implicit agreement. The rule seems to be widely broken and almost never enforced. So what's the problem? Here are some concerns: A few players masochistically comply with this rule and suffer significant handicap. Also, authorities surrender a hostage to fortune, when they allow players to pick which rules to obey; and permit directors to ignore certain infractions. The regulation on "refusing to play" is also woolly and rarely enforced. In the past, international teams (mainly American) have initially refused to play against alleged "cheats" but escaped penalty. This has the appearance of a crude "gamesmanship" ploy that often seems to have been effective. Players will suffer unnecessarily until regulators simplify/clarify the rules, and directors try to enforce them, consistently. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted September 14, 2016 Report Share Posted September 14, 2016 The WBF have a regulation forbidding an undisclosed agreement to open a 1-bid with a king below average. FYP. All undisclosed agreements are against the laws. Certain (disclosed) agreements are against certain regulations. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aberlour10 Posted September 14, 2016 Report Share Posted September 14, 2016 I accept that Justin Lall and Gonzales Goded are ethical and above criticism. Please treat these opinions, in that context. so as my opinions please. First, the action taken by the spanish captain should never happen. Here ...we all agree. But I dont agree with tries to construct some kind of "Winning-ugly" story due to this incident. Team Spain has been penalized by 10 imps for it., lost 2 imps on the interrupted hand.: No score damage for the USA. There were no further incidents at the tables, Spain won clear. No reason for statements like.."they desere not..... etc etc. They deserve....showing for example, just in this moment great perforrmance vs Monaco. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted September 14, 2016 Report Share Posted September 14, 2016 FYP. All undisclosed agreements are against the laws. Certain (disclosed) agreements are against certain regulations. I take your point Helene_T. Many top players appear to have this understanding, legal or not. Years ago, Cascade reported relevant observations on legal websites but nothing was ever done, as far as I know. IMO, you are allowed to play such methods, if disclosed, at some World Championship level events; but they are classified as HUMs , so are subject to horrendous restrictions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 I just found this thread that I missed completely. I want to thank everyone who supported us. I have mixed feelings because we did great, but we could ad done much better. In 2012 I cried when we failed to qualify by 2 VPs, not because of me, but because I felt it was my father's last chance. It is hard to explain how much has been stolen from my dad during this years of cheating. According to unoficial third party works Lantaron Goded qualfied 1st, 3rd and 1st on the butler of 3 consecutive european championships in the early 90s, it was Giorgio Belladona himself who lectured another italian comentator on vugraph for talking as if Lantarón-Goded were "lucky" when they were the best European pair. Sadly they were kind of alone and didn't even qualify for BB once. Then they stopped winning, and it was not because they started to play worse, others started to do magic. Now that things have leveled back they were the best pair of the play offs by a large margin, and we finally had an option and we almost got it, but missed by an inch. Will we have another?. I also suspect that directors were lenient with my team because of their history of 40 years of flawless conduct. As well as the rest of the team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 According to unoficial third party works Lantaron Goded qualfied 1st, 3rd and 1st on the butler of 3 consecutive european championships in the early 90s, it was Giorgio Belladona himself who lectured another italian comentator on vugraph for talking as if Lantarón-Goded were "lucky" when they were the best European pair. Sadly they were kind of alone and didn't even qualify for BB once. Then they stopped winning, and it was not because they started to play worse, others started to do magic. Now that things have leveled back they were the best pair of the play offs by a large margin, and we finally had an option and we almost got it, but missed by an inch. Will we have another?. You'd think after your team became a near laughing stock for the piss poor nature of the analysis that underlay the charges you brought against Bathurst and Lall you might have learned something... But no. Here you are essentially claiming that all the pairs that outscored Lantaron-Goded were cheating... Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't be surprised if some of the pairs who were scoring well WERE cheating, but this isn't how you deal with this sort of thing.You do real analysis, make specific claims, and back this with real data. So let's hear it...Who were the pairs in Wroclaw whose performance suddenly didn't measure up to what they were achieving before? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 You'd think after your team became a near laughing stock for the piss poor nature of the analysis that underlay the charges you brought against Bathurst and Lall you might have learned something... But no. Here you are essentially claiming that all the pairs that outscored Lantaron-Goded were cheating... Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't be surprised if some of the pairs who were scoring well WERE cheating, but this isn't how you deal with this sort of thing.You do real analysis, make specific claims, and back this with real data. So let's hear it...Who were the pairs in Wroclaw whose performance suddenly didn't measure up to what they were achieving before? Additionally, winners do not conduct themselves the way Spain did. Contrast to what the US Seniors did in Bali. They were playing against the dirtiest known pair at the time, and they were essentially asked to 'play on'. They figured out a way to break their code - and they did. Gonzo, I am happy you got as deep as you did, but it would have been better to focus on bridge and not extreme gamesmanship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 I expected way better from you and others Phil, I don't know if it is more insulting for me or for you to even suggest that after missing qualify finishing 5th in 2004, 2008, and 2012, we would retire in 2016 in a close match just by the offchance of influencing concentration of.... Lall-Bathust and Hamson-Greco! It is quite laughable that you can even think this would affect them more than us. About Bali comparison... what the *****? are you really comparing Justin with the doctors? I was going to explain something, but just comparing both of them is revolting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 Sorry Richard will have to answer that privately only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 I expected way better from you and others Phil, I don't know if it is more insulting for me or for you to even suggest that after missing qualify finishing 5th in 2004, 2008, and 2012, we would retire in 2016 in a close match just by the offchance of influencing concentration of.... Lall-Bathust and Hamson-Greco! It is quite laughable that you can even think this would affect them more than us. About Bali comparison... what the *****? are you really comparing Justin with the doctors? I was going to explain something, but just comparing both of them is revolting. 1. And I expected better from you and your teammates Gonzo. I don't know what you mean by 'retire'. I hope it doesn't mean, "we will win at all costs which includes creating a diversion". 2. Of course its going to affect them. Imagine if JLall would have stood up in the last segment and said to the WBF and your captain, "Jordi and Gonzalo are playing some sort of encrypted carding (illegal), and Im not sitting down until you review the hand history". Of course, you can take out this pair and play his Dad or the other pair. To not see the fallout of this is really amazing. As Bathurst left the table in the last segment, he said, "you guys should be ashamed of yourself". And he's totally right. 3. No of course I'm not comparing Justin with the doctors, but the situations are similar. In both cases, Spain (USA seniors) thought their opponents were doing something illegal. The USA Seniors played on in spite of ...cough...hack...cough being a huge distraction. Your team threw a tantrum and left! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 ... after missing qualify finishing 5th in 2004, 2008, and 2012... Gonzo - I like you too much to get overly negative here, and I am really happy you guys went as far as you did. I think this will give you some momentum for the next cycle of the Europeans. Clearly you have established yourselves as a world-class team and competitive and I hope you can build on it. Plus you and Jordi play really well together and I hope that you have the opportunity to come to the US for some nationals. Dude, a few months ago you posted about what a rough draw for the first few matches you had in your GROUP. And you crushed! But I hope that in a few months you look back on this and listen to what most of the world was saying after the incident and realize there was a better way to handle the situation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 There were better ways to handle the situation, I told you, I shouldn't had sit back and should had played a role as I knew Justin while my team didn't. But I didn't, I found an excuse not to act*. Still the directors have more to be ashamed than us. The voices you hear all say the same, but there are some I hear that applaud what we did, they don't convince me, but they tell me things aren't as clear as they seem to be for anyone who thinks psyching in 3rd position is "just bridge", A team-mate overheard a director saying after we won that it didn't matter, USA was going home one way or another. It probably was just the personal opinion of one of many directors, but hints that they were taking the thing more seriously than you'd think. As I told Richard, we didn't play great, my partnership performed better than in 2012, but the others slighly underperformed. The real difference was that the others played worse. And it also happened in Budapest, everyone is making more mistakes with the cameras than they used to do 3 years ago. It is hard to explain but the feeling is very real. Now there is a window of clean game cheater free, I don't know how long will it remain open before someone develops a method encrypted enough to warrant not being catched, but I am glad we could get use of it this time. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Do we really need to hash this out here? Wasn't there enough arguing on Bridge Winners about it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Do we really need to hash this out here? Wasn't there enough arguing on Bridge Winners about it? Your the one necroing a thread that hasn't seen a post in four days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Do we really need to hash this out here? Wasn't there enough arguing on Bridge Winners about it? I cannot think of a more perfect place since Gonzalo is a very frequent BBF contributor and can probably speak more openly about it here. I think this conversation has run its course, however, and I hope it ended on a positive note. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 As I told Richard, we didn't play great, my partnership performed better than in 2012, but the others slighly underperformed. The real difference was that the others played worse. And it also happened in Budapest, everyone is making more mistakes with the cameras than they used to do 3 years ago. It is hard to explain but the feeling is very real. In my view the likeliest explanation is that you have become better - you make fewer mistakes, but you still notice more that you could have done better, and you notice more mistakes by the opponents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Your the one necroing a thread that hasn't seen a post in four daysSorry, I was away for several days, and didn't notice the date on the post. Although I don't think a few days counts as a "necro" :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Do we really need to hash this out here? Wasn't there enough arguing on Bridge Winners about it? I think what you meant to say is that you don't care about this topic, and you wish you wouldn't have to read more about this. Fluffy's last post above genuinely added something to me, beyond what he and his team had written on bridgewinners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 The Spanish team told WBF officials that they found evidence of what might be an illegal agreement by an American pair. Other teams (including American teams) have done that. Here, the accused American pair are sure they are innocent. The accusation might be wrong. The evidence might be inadequate. But the Spanish team behaved correctly. Reporting what you believe to be an infraction is legal and sensible. The accusation isn't gamesmanship. The WBF rule about agreements to open at the one level on less than 8 HCP is stupid, woolly, and hard to enforce. Understandably, directors are reluctant to rule on it. 3rd in hand, opportunities for such openings are rare. Hence some pairs argue that they are "psyches". Most believe that this is just Bridge. A typical commentator wrote that, playing Precision and holding xxx xxx KQJ xxxx, 3rd in hand, not vulnerable, if he failed to open 1D, he would expect to be benched. Initially, the WBF refused to give a ruling and the Spanish captain took umbrage. IMO, he was wrong and his action does smack of gamesmanship. But other teams (often American) have threatened not to play in the past -- with less justification -- and escaped sanction. IMO, from beginning to end, the main culprit is the WBF. The WBF should simplify, clarify, and consistently enforce its rules. Some laws and regulations add no value. They are widely broken but rarely enforced. Such rules should be scrapped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomSac Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 A team-mate overheard a director saying after we won that it didn't matter, USA was going home one way or another. It probably was just the personal opinion of one of many directors, but hints that they were taking the thing more seriously than you'd think. It is nice that you think it's cool to say things like this so nonchalantly. "I have hearsay evidence from my secret anonymous clearly biased source that he randomly overheard an anonymous director saying to an unknown person in passing that the USA team was going home one way or another." Cool story. The WBF in their own statement said "Max Bavin has investigated the claims of the Spanish team and found them to be unsubstantiated." (Max Bavin being the head director). I don't have a lot more to say about this subject but it is really ridiculous that you have not even learned from this that maybe you should be a little more careful with the things you say and the way you say them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 (Pseudo-intellectual rambling) Nigel, your post contains so many inconsistencies that it's hard to respond to it. Many (including me) are convinced that the nature, and especially the timing of the Spanish complaint are utter bullshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billw55 Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 Nigel, your post contains so many inconsistencies that it's hard to respond to it. Many (including me) are convinced that the nature, and especially the timing of the Spanish complaint are utter bullshit.OK, on the timing, I cannot argue. I do not play internationally, obviously, but there seems to be strong consensus that the timing and mini-boycott were abnormal. As for the nature, I think that if Spain genuinely believed that there was an infraction, they should report it for further investigation. They could be wrong, if so that will be decided (in fact it was so decided, as I understand). But reporting it at all seems like the proper thing to do, just that they should do so in a more commonly accepted manner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 :( Pseudo-intellectual rambling :) Nigel, your post contains so many inconsistencies that it's hard to respond to it. Phil, please point out a couple of the worst inconsistencies. Many (including me) are convinced that the nature, and especially the timing of the Spanish complaint are utter bullshit. The opinion of neutrals (neither American nor Spanish) carries more weight with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted October 4, 2016 Report Share Posted October 4, 2016 No time for it now Nigel. Maybe later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted October 5, 2016 Report Share Posted October 5, 2016 I cannot think of a more perfect place since Gonzalo is a very frequent BBF contributor and can probably speak more openly about it here. That was my feeling, except that anytime I post something I see it reposted/linked on BW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.