inquiry Posted April 11, 2005 Report Share Posted April 11, 2005 I wonder now that BBO is huge, could we run main room comparisons across more than 16 boards? No need for 100, but something like 26 plays or 49/50 would be nice, especially given it is imps, and one or two wild actions can screw up the averages for all the normal results. It is a thought anyway. Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandal Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 I wonder now that BBO is huge, could we run main room comparisons across more than 16 boards? No need for 100, but something like 26 plays or 49/50 would be nice, especially given it is imps, and one or two wild actions can screw up the averages for all the normal results. It is a thought anyway. Ben Very good suggestion I hope this is possible :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred Posted April 12, 2005 Report Share Posted April 12, 2005 Agree that this is a good idea, but unfortunately it would be a lot harder to implement than you might think. Blame me for inflexible early design. I will take a closer look at what would be involved when I get a chance. Fred GitelmanBridge Base Inc.www.bridgebase.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winkle Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 While I agree with Ben that more comparisons would be a good idea for imps, it may not be such a good idea for matchpoints. Even now with 16 plays/board, it doesn't take long for me to end up with no comparsion in a matchpoint session. I also like to review hands with myhands, which (I think) doesn't post the hands until they've been played 16 times. There are matchpoint boards that I played 24 hours ago that still haven't shown up in myhands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.