dickiegera Posted July 30, 2016 Report Share Posted July 30, 2016 [hv=pc=n&e=sq9864hjt87d75c98&d=w&v=0&b=8&a=1np]133|200[/hv] Is it better to bid 2♥ transfer to spades and pass or bid 2♣ [stayman] and pass opener's 2 of a major bid or if opener bids 2♦ correct to 2 spades? 1 NT is 15-17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted July 30, 2016 Report Share Posted July 30, 2016 If you have the agreement that stayman followed by 2♠ is weak then obviously that is better. oHowever, I think it is better to play that sequence as invitational. That means that this hand will have to transfer to spades. It is also possible to play stayman followed by 2♥ as showing this hand. The advantage of this is that partner will always correct to 2♠, so you can then play the delayed 2♥ bid as forcing. This allows you to put more strong hand types into stayman. The disadvantage of that method is that you can't use stayman with a weak hand with 5-5 in the majors (or with 4♠5♥ for that matter). 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tramticket Posted August 1, 2016 Report Share Posted August 1, 2016 For me, Stayman followed by 2♠ over a 2♦ response is weak and this shape (admittedly, this is in a weak NT context). So I bid Stayman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fromageGB Posted August 1, 2016 Report Share Posted August 1, 2016 To my way of thinking, the ♣ then Major sequences have to be weak or invitational, as when GF you can do other things such as rebid at the 3+level, so the question is which is more useful? In terms of frequency, the weak option will be wanted more often, and I would chose that. At IMPs you may not want to miss a game, so you might choose invitational. The answer of course, is to have a 2-point range NT, and then you do not need any invitational bids and bidding is so much easier. The related question, then, is ♣ then ♥ bid with 55xx or 45xx ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggwhiz Posted August 1, 2016 Report Share Posted August 1, 2016 IMO playing garbage stayman where bidding 2M over a 2♦ response to play is very valuable, more frequent and flexible ie when you catch partner with 2 spades and 4 hearts it is almost always worth a trick to play in hearts. It's also a clear choice in a partnership (like mine) that can open 1nt with a 5-card heart suit that often has no good rebid after 1♥-p-1♠. If you switch to this style the first rule is that opener may NEVER bid anything but 2♦ after stayman with no major. They shouldn't anyway but I see it done often. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmnka447 Posted August 1, 2016 Report Share Posted August 1, 2016 Unless you have a specific agreement to show a weak hand over 1NT-2 ♣-2 ♦- ?, then just transfer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts