ahydra Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 MPs, you're vul, they're not [hv=pc=n&s=sjt53haq942d76ck4&d=n&v=n&b=5&a=1n(12-14)p2c(stayman)p2dp2h(4!S5!H%20less%20than%20INV)pp3c]133|200[/hv] 1N is 12-14 and 2C is bog-standard Stayman. 2H shows 45 in the majors with less than INV values. Your call - X, pass, 3H, something else? Edited to add hand diagram. ahydra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 MPs, you're vul, they're not J10xx AQ9xx xx Kx Partner deals, your side bids 1N 2C 2D 2H, where 1N is 12-14 and 2C is bog-standard Stayman. 2H shows 45 in the majors with less than INV values. Partner passes this and RHO butts in with 3C. Your call - X, pass, 3H, something else? Will add a hand diagram tomorrow when not posting from phone. ahydra Seems like a textbook double. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 MPs, Partner deals, you're vul, they're not ♠ J 10 x x ♥ A Q 9 x x ♦ x x ♣ Kx1N 2C 2D 2H, where 1N is 12-14 and 2C is bog-standard Stayman. 2H shows 45 in the majors with less than INV values.Partner passes this and RHO butts in with 3C. Your call - X, pass, 3H, something else? I rankDouble = Competitive. Descriptive. Maximum for previous actions.Pass = Pusillanimous.3♥ = Committal. Misdescriptive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert2734 Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 And if you double, what do you lead? I'll double at matchpoints because I don't expect any matchpoints for -110 anyhow. So -470 is no different. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 And if you double, what do you lead? I'll double at matchpoints because I don't expect any matchpoints for -110 anyhow. So -470 is no different. It's not a lock partner passes. Anyway, I lead a diamond if he does. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert2734 Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Bidding "three over three" , bidding at the three level when the opponents are already at the three level, with an eight card fit, is anti-law. I'm not sure how partner would know three hearts is right. In any case, the one thing I won't do is defend an undoubled contract when we have a majority of the points. Of course I've been -470 before but I won't get many matchpoints for -110 anyhow. So mister orange county, you going to the long beach regional? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Seems like a textbook double. Textbook X is Kxx/x in the minors so partner with AKx, xx, AJ10xx, Jxx can bid 3♦ in comfort That said I think I double Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 Bidding "three over three" , bidding at the three level when the opponents are already at the three level, with an eight card fit, is anti-law. I'm not sure how partner would know three hearts is right. In any case, the one thing I won't do is defend an undoubled contract when we have a majority of the points. Of course I've been -470 before but I won't get many matchpoints for -110 anyhow. So mister orange county, you going to the long beach regional? An out of town cousin is coming M and T and we are seeing our son the weekend of the 4th. Might play hooky midweek for a day. Do I know you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted June 25, 2016 Report Share Posted June 25, 2016 It's not a lock partner passes. Anyway, I lead a diamond if he does.Same here at MP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert2734 Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Don't know me. Gonna play goldrush tuesday wednesday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahydra Posted June 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Thanks all. Basically just wanted to check I wasn't being too greedy by doubling here, which is what I picked. Partner had KQx xx KQ10xx Q10x and bid 3D which drifted one off (due to RHO having AJ9x in trumps) for a joint bottom. If he somehow guesses to pass the double, we can as it happens collect 300 because the 3C bidder had a rather poor suit: xx KJ AJ9x A9xxx ahydra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Don't know me. Gonna play goldrush tuesday wednesday. Then knock 'em dead. Introduce yourself if you get a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Thanks all. Basically just wanted to check I wasn't being too greedy by doubling here, which is what I picked. Partner had KQx xx KQ10xx Q10x and bid 3D which drifted one off (due to RHO having AJ9x in trumps) for a joint bottom. If he somehow guesses to pass the double, we can as it happens collect 300 because the 3C bidder had a rather poor suit: xx KJ AJ9x A9xxx ahydra Strange 3D call I think. You've advertised both majors and we have a preponderance of points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesleyC Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 I like your auction. Partner's 3D bid showed a lack of understanding for MPs scoring! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmnka447 Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 I'm doubling also and leading a ♦ if partner passes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Strange 3D call I think. You've advertised both majors and we have a preponderance of points. Why isn't my hand AJxx, xxxxx, AJx, x where 4♦ and 3♣ are both possibly making, it's a routine 3♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 Why isn't my hand AJxx, xxxxx, AJx, x where 4♦ and 3♣ are both possibly making, it's a routine 3♦. I've haven't said I have diamond length. When we have found a fit and passed it out, our doubles are cooperative/penalty, not "I have a good hand" and shortness in their suit. Even then opposite the hand you gave we seem to be a favorite to beat 3C anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted June 26, 2016 Report Share Posted June 26, 2016 I've haven't said I have diamond length. When we have found a fit and passed it out, our doubles are cooperative/penalty, not "I have a good hand" and shortness in their suit. Even then opposite the hand you gave we seem to be a favorite to beat 3C anyway. Yes but beating it 1 won't get you many MPs, and if the bidder has the J♣ with higher honour(s) and spades are 4-2 which is pretty likely, you're not beating it at all. We have not found a fit, it is quite likely we don't have more than a 7 card fit, and if we do it could easily be in diamonds. If you're going to double on this hand, you can easily leave partner no good option. I said I would do it anyway, but you have to be aware of the risks. I wouldn't have this problem (I'd have a different one) as we occasionally garbage stayman out of a weak NT with a 4-4, so partner would have bid 2♠ over 2♥ with a 3253 and I would know he only had 2 hearts. My X if I chose to do it would now be pure pens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted June 29, 2016 Report Share Posted June 29, 2016 Clear double. I have some sympathy for partner's pull. I don't think I would have pulled, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts