Another I-N-S-A-N-E robot bid :)

[lycier]

HA-HA-HA!! :D :D :D

You are just TOO MUCH, Lycier!

I start believing you are a ROBOT, too!! :D :D :D :D

 

I am pretty glad to hear wonderful words so much.http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif

Of course, I would better accept some expert's opinions.http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gifhttp://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif

 

Many thanks to Stefan_0, especially to Stephen Tu.http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gifhttp://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gifhttp://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif

[lycier]

Let's go on discussing.

 

I don't think the Double over 3♣ is wrong -- generally you can double with almost any distribution 19+hcp, since you can then come back with your longest suit next round.

The problem on this specific hand, of course, is that South with a bit different hand might jump to 5♦ over the Double, expecting North to have a least secondary support in diamonds -- that would be awkward to say the least.... :huh:

 

But on the bidding in your diagram, I think it's wrong from North to pass 4♣ -- with North's hand it must be almost certain that N/S has game in one of the majors.

North should rebid 4♥ on the second round, and South presumably correct to 4♠ -- hopefully that's not a cue-bid :)

 

Hi Stefan_0 :

 

You are very brave, but you still got screwed this time.

After preemptive 3♣, what's the best next for north Gib on the Gib CC ? See my example hand.

 

 

[hv=http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer.html?sn=Robot&s=ST87642H2DJT8742C&wn=Robot&w=SHJ9875DK3CKQJ984&nn=Robot&n=SAQ53HAKQT4DCAT52&en=Robot&e=SKJ9H63DAQ965C763&d=w&v=o&b=8&a=3C(Preempt%20--%207+%20%21C%3B%2010-%20HCP%3B%20%21CQ%3B%206+%20total%20points)4C(Strong%20two%20suiter%20--%204-%20losers)P4D(New%20suit%20forced%20--%203+%20%21D)P4H(3-%20%21C%3B%203-%20%21D%3B%205+%20%21H%3B%205+%20%21S%3B%204-%20losers)P4S(3+%20%21D%3B%202+%20%21S)PPP&p=CKCTC7S6S2C4S5S9D9D4D3S3SASJSTCQCAC6D2CJC2C3S8C8H2H5HAH3HKH6DTH9HQSKDJH8D5D7DKHTC9C5D6S7D8HJSQDAH4DQS4H7]400|300[/hv]

 

The solution is cuebid 4♣ to show strong two suit with 4 losers, especially points to majors, I used to call 4♣ 4-loser convention and used to call jump cuebid 5♣ 3-loser convention.

How wonderful Gib CC .http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif

Just everyone see, turns out, my bidding sequence is most reasonable.

 

I am thinking if everyone can learn Gib CC seriously, where is the Bug?http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif how many terrible misunderstandings can there be in your hand?http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif

 

Any ideas?

Would you tell us your best approach?

[lycier]

Actually it is third time to meet such style hand.

First time,I can't remembered it.

Second time, I found its answer.

Third time, I saw Stefan_O's hand.

So I guess the maximum probability for this hand is 1/30,000 .Its minimum probability is 1/50,000.

Now there is a problem related :

Assume this is a real bug, but with 1/30,000 - 50,000 probability,is it necessary for the Gib programmers to fix it?