Bbradley62 Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 From Just Play Bridge, so no hand record. Pard deals, no interference:1N-2♣2♦-3♦3N 2♦ is explained as 2-5♣; 2-5♦; 2-3♥; 2-3♠, 15-17HCP.3♦ is 5+♦; 13+ total points.3NT is exactly the same as 2♦. Are there any circumstances under which GIB would not bid 3N over 3♦? Maybe if he had both diamond support and a max he'd bid 4♦ instead, so the 3N explanation is the best he can do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan_O Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Are there any circumstances under which GIB would not bid 3N over 3♦? Maybe if he had both diamond support and a max he'd bid 4♦ instead, so the 3N explanation is the best he can do? Cannot answer that one, but I think in a std system (already having denied 4cd major) 3♥ and 3♠ would show a stopper in the suit and indicating NO stopper in the other major (to avoid bad 3NTs). I never saw Gib use stuff like that, but wish somebody could add it to the bidding-db :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.