Jump to content

Uncomfortable


  

43 members have voted

  1. 1. Your call?



Recommended Posts

there is nothing "robust" about this 13 count. I have a great deal of pride in my spade AK and club stop but nothing much else. Bidding more than 2n seems wrong and catering to spades with no worries in clubs seems like heading in the wrong direction.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in with the 2 NT crowd.

 

It isn't great to have to bid it as NT may be a terrible contract because of transportation issue. But what's the alternative?

 

OTOH, unless LHO has made a 2 overcall on a really bad suit, partner ought to have some good values and possibly something in beyond anything held in . 2 was a forcing bid after all.

 

2 NT also frees up the whole 3 level for partner to describe his/her hand. If partner rebids a major we play game in that suit.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the one person who said pass - if thats your action hope you have a large stable of partners cause you will lose this one quickly - one CANNOT pass forcing bids and expect partner to be understanding about it - it would a a unilateral action which serious players cannot abide. Better you bid something and perhaps land in a horrible spot then be right and lose a partner. Daffydoc
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the one person who said pass - if thats your action hope you have a large stable of partners cause you will lose this one quickly - one CANNOT pass forcing bids and expect partner to be understanding about it - it would a a unilateral action which serious players cannot abide. Better you bid something and perhaps land in a horrible spot then be right and lose a partner. Daffydoc

 

This is the standard reply (which i fully expected to get). All it shows is a lack of moral courage. Should you be trying to find the bid which has the biggest positive expectation or which has the smallest chance of annoying partner?

 

If you make unilateral decisions too frequently you're probably a very deluded person, but sometimes constant buck-passing doesn't get the job done and someone needs to stick their neck out.

 

If we got a bad result on the back of it, I would expect my partner to appreciate I was trying to get us the best result on the board just as I expect the same of him whenever he takes any decision, mundane or otherwise.

 

As for the expectation from passing versus bidding on, I assess the former as having a better return on average non-vul. You should devote your time to proving me wrong.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the standard reply (which i fully expected to get). All it shows is a lack of moral courage. Should you be trying to find the bid which has the biggest positive expectation or which has the smallest chance of annoying partner?

 

If you make unilateral decisions too frequently you're probably a very deluded person, but sometimes constant buck-passing doesn't get the job done and someone needs to stick their neck out.

 

If we got a bad result on the back of it, I would expect my partner to appreciate I was trying to get us the best result on the board just as I expect the same of him whenever he takes any decision, mundane or otherwise.

Agree. It's a kind of bridge player's fallacy, committed in almost every thread on BBF, to think that just because an action can have silly outcomes, it must be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All it shows is a lack of moral courage.

 

Au contraire mon chum.

 

I've seen countless partnerships disintegrate when the partner starts overbidding to compensate for impending moral courage and if I do it twice with the same partner the Director or a committee will roll back my successes if my partner so much as flutters an eyelash before they make that forcing bid.

 

Passing a reverse after having responded on a (the wrong) shapely 5 count is not in the same league as this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the standard reply (which i fully expected to get). All it shows is a lack of moral courage. Should you be trying to find the bid which has the biggest positive expectation or which has the smallest chance of annoying partner?

 

If you make unilateral decisions too frequently you're probably a very deluded person, but sometimes constant buck-passing doesn't get the job done and someone needs to stick their neck out.

 

If we got a bad result on the back of it, I would expect my partner to appreciate I was trying to get us the best result on the board just as I expect the same of him whenever he takes any decision, mundane or otherwise.

 

As for the expectation from passing versus bidding on, I assess the former as having a better return on average non-vul. You should devote your time to proving me wrong.

 

"moral courage" What the heck is that in a card game? Are you a lawyer?

 

How could lying to you partner be "moral" anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"moral courage" What the heck is that in a card game? Are you a lawyer?

 

How could lying to you partner be "moral" anything?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courage,

 

especially:

 

"Courage (also called bravery, bravado or valour) is the choice and willingness to confront agony, pain, danger, uncertainty or intimidation. Physical courage is courage in the face of physical pain, hardship, death or threat of death, while moral courage is the ability to act rightly in the face of popular opposition, shame, scandal, discouragement, or personal loss."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think pass is right unless LHO is a very sound overcaller, but I don't think it's terrible.

 

However, if partner wants to pass on these hands, I think we're better off playing non-forcing free bids (and I'm happy to play them). This isn't an annoyance at breaking agreements so much as a recognition that we should be playing systems that match our natural inclinations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should you be trying to find the bid which has the biggest positive expectation or which has the smallest chance of annoying partner?

 

As for the expectation from passing versus bidding on, I assess the former as having a better return on average non-vul. You should devote your time to proving me wrong.

 

Although I agree in principle that both partners should be allowed to sometimes take speculative action, the fact that you are proposing to pass 2S on this hand suggests that maybe you're not ready for that kind of power... ;)

 

Partner should have a relatively sound 2S bid because they have the option to double 2C and then convert to 2S and if partner has stretched in terms of HCP, then then they should have short clubs, extra spade length or both!

 

If partner rebids a non-forcing 3S, you have an obvious 4S raise.

 

Finally, holding 2 keycards and a diamond control, slam is absolutely in the picture. How about [QJT9xxx AKx xxx ---] or something similar?

 

If I held an actual minimum hand like [xx KQxxx Kx Kxxx] AND I had a hint from RHO's tempo that they might have some values, then pass *might* have some merit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A K

Q J 6 5 3

J

Q 10 8 6 4

 

You open 1, LHO overcalls 2, P bids 2 (forcing), which comes back to you. I don't know the vul - this was passed to me. Assume scoring is some form of imps. What's your call?

I rank

  1. 2N = NAT. Perhaps they won't lead a .
  2. 3 = NAT. Susceptible to ruffs but could well win the post-mortem.
  3. 3 = NAT but daft.
  4. 3 = UCB and demented.
  5. Other e.g. Wank's Pass (or an urgent telephone summons) might be best of all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for the expectation from passing versus bidding on, I assess the former as having a better return on average non-vul. You should devote your time to proving me wrong.

 

It's obviously impossible to 'prove' you wrong, but I think you are wrong.

You want to pass if partner has some 10-count with 5 spades that will pass 2NT.

Any time partner has six spades, I think it will be percentage to be bidding on because he is strong enough not to start with a double then bid spades non-forcing (which he isn't going to do with the 5251 11-count that you are worried about).

 

Your hand basically isn't that bad. If partner has a game force, I would expect to make game. Boring hands like QJxxx Ax KQ109x x (yes I know about the cunning diamond pips) will make 3NT in practice. QJ10xxx Ax AQxx x is a perfectly acceptable 4S contract.

 

To me, that makes the odds on pass very poor at imps.

 

Give yourself A QJxxx KJ Q10xxx and I have far more sympathy with passing, even though 3NT is still likely odds on if we bid it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...