Jump to content

BBF vs JEC Sat, Feb 13, at 2PM EST (8PM CET)


diana_eva

Recommended Posts

We lost by 50 after a very nice start. Wayne played like a champ.

 

Board 20 was interesting and it probably decided the fate of the match. You're -13 IMPs and this hand comes up. Rightly or wrongly, you decide to stretch and accept partner's slam invite. How will you play?

 

[hv=pc=n&s=SAJ432HAQ9DA42C74&w=SK875H762DJ53C632&n=SQ6HJ8DK9876CAKQ5&e=ST9HKT543DQTCJT98&d=s&v=b&b=20&k=s&a=1NP4NP6NPPP&p=C3CAC9C4]399|300[/hv]

 

Click Next to see the opening lead (a club).

 

How realistic is it to find the winning line at the table? Assuming you're an expert and not me :P

 

 

 

Full hand was:

 

[hv=pc=n&s=SAJ432HAQ9DA42C74&w=SK875H762DJ53C632&n=SQ6HJ8DK9876CAKQ5&e=ST9HKT543DQTCJT98&d=s&v=b&b=20&a=1NP4NP6NPPP&p=C3CAC9C4]399|300[/hv]

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a shame it was a 28 board match and not a 5 board match :P

 

I'm usually pretty bad at defense problems, but when I got one right on board 1, I was feeling pretty good about it, and then a game swing in on board 2 had me in cloud 9.

 

I happily accept my fair share of the blame for my 4NT bid on board 20, guess what happens when both sides take pushy actions to try and get a swing in :). The play isn't quite as complicated as I thought when we were talking about it earlier.

 

 

Win the club lead, run the jack of hearts to the king and ace and play a spade to the queen. That much I had said, but when North ducks (or you have 12 tricks), you can just give up a diamond for 2 spades, 3 hearts, 4 diamonds and 3 clubs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a CC, mainly the BBO 2/1 default with this marked for 1NT:

 

1NT=15-17: Stayman, Jacoby, 2♠->3♣, 2♠->3♣, 2NT->3♦, 3♣=5-5 minors weak, 3♦=5-5 minors GF, 3♥=31(54), 3♠=13(54), Gerber, Texas

 

Nothing discussed in detail though. I wd have assumed all that is on if pd made some strange bid I wasn't sure about :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the alternatives were 2 followed by 3 and 2NT followed by 4, unless the latter would be taken as showing a shortage.

 

I assumed 2 followed by 3 would be 5+4M, and no idea how she would have taken 2NT then 4. 4NT just seemed practical, with the possibility of 5NT pick-a-slam if accepting. The other table just bid 1N-3N.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...