Jump to content

Organized crime?


Recommended Posts

A 50-officer strong police team raids a bridge club after having been given a hint that there are people there who exceed the maximum number of playing cards (100) which you are allowed to possess in Thailand. Watch out, udcadenny and other Thai bridge players.

 

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/892149-british-led-card-room-raided-by-officials-in-south-pattaya/?utm_source=newsletter-20160204-0723&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read that too. Makes me consider removing Thailand from my list of potential vacation spots. You can be arrested for having more than 120 cards? Some of my custom games have more cards than that - will Ticket to Ride land me in the slammer? And I don't want to think about what I might be charged with for carrying a backgammon set.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, they apparently have very archaic laws that equate almost all card playing to gambling.

 

From http://www.onlinebetting.com/legal/thailand/

The primary law that regulates gambling in Thailand is the Gambling Act, B.E. 2478 (1935). If you click that link you will see there are 46 ministerial regulations, 16 legal opinions of Council of State and a Royal Decree all related to this law.

 

There are also many separate laws relating to gambling. One example is the Playing Cards Act, B.E. 2486 (1943) which makes owning, manufacturing and selling playing cards a crime. Furthermore, the Anti-Money Laundering Act, B.E. 2542 (1999) strengthens our anti-gambling law in certain cases.

 

He goes on to say that despite this, around 70% of Thai people are regular gamblers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the policie officers have some personal interests in arresting relatively well-oof foreigners who have the money to pay the bribes. Or it may be a relatively easy way to meet their quota for crackdowns on gambling.

Sorry this was silly facebook rumours. Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We may laugh about this as silly Thai stuff. However, I remember that the exact same thing happened in the USA only about 20 years ago.

 

IIRC, the story was described in the ACBL bulletin. During the police raid score cards and pencils were confiscated.

 

Rik

I found a 1972 reference from Canada: https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1946&dat=19720901&id=EYs0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=fqEFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4099,487144&hl=en

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh. Duplicate bridge may not be "gambling", but I seldom play in a duplicate event without some side wagers with friends. I still remember the shock on my lol opponent's face when I missed a difficult end position and muttered, "damn, that's just cost me £25".

 

Better be careful from now on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Many moons ago a Toronto club was facing a gaming house charge (there was rubber bridge for reasonable stakes going on) and Eric Murray defended them in court.

 

He told the judge: Bridge is a game of skill the way I play it but a game of luck the way YOU do. They lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh. Duplicate bridge may not be "gambling"

Is it not? When I first wanted to play bridge I asked around the local clubs but all of them were only playing "penny a hundred" games. I certainly considered that gambling and declined on principle - I still think it ought to be against the law for a minor to play in such games. My university partner also liked such side bets during a game but those were always done strictly between him and the opps - he essentially paid or received double.

 

With duplicate there is a difference of course, in as much as there is a fixed table fee and you usually cannot win or lose more based on the results. But a tournament with cash prizes is surely just as much gambling as poker, a mix of luck and skill in which you sometimes win money and other times lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Working at a pool hall in college, I often reflected on the gambling laws. If two people got together to play pool, each put up some money, and the winner got it, that was gambling and illegal. But if a bunch of people got together to play pool, everyone put up some money, and the guy who won the most got it, now it's called a tournament and was perfectly ok. The same was true for chess; it had nothing to do with chance or skill, or any other reason we could fathom.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...