zenbiddist Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 Hi there, Clearly I don't know how to lay this double hesitation movement out - pairs would end up replaying boards.If anyone knows how to fix it - email me and I'll give you the doc to modify. Thanks - johnno.newman@gmail.com http://s29.postimg.org/yy9jd6ayv/dblhes.png Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordontd Posted January 27, 2016 Report Share Posted January 27, 2016 Hi there, Clearly I don't know how to lay this double hesitation movement out - pairs would end up replaying boards.If anyone knows how to fix it - email me and I'll give you the doc to modify. Thanks - johnno.newman@gmail.com http://s29.postimg.org/yy9jd6ayv/dblhes.png CheersHere's the one from EBUScore: 6.Tables:.Double.Hesitation.Mitchell,.(Pair.13.=.Pair.2)Table.1..............Table.2..............Table.3..............Table.4..............Table.5..............Table.6Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set1...1...7...1~3......1...2...8...4~6......1...3...9...7~9......1...4...10..10~12....1...5...11..16~18....1...6...12..19~212...1...6...4~6......2...12..7...7~9......2...3...8...10~12....2...4...9...13~15....2...5...10..19~21....2...2...11..22~243...1...2...7~9......3...11..6...10~12....3...3...7...13~15....3...4...8...16~18....3...5...9...22~24....3...12..10..1~34...1...12..10~12....4...10..2...13~15....4...3...6...16~18....4...4...7...19~21....4...5...8...1~3......4...11..9...4~65...1...11..13~15....5...9...12..16~18....5...3...2...19~21....5...4...6...22~24....5...5...7...4~6......5...10..8...7~96...1...10..16~18....6...8...11..19~21....6...3...12..22~24....6...4...2...1~3......6...5...6...7~9......6...9...7...10~127...1...9...19~21....7...7...10..22~24....7...3...11..1~3......7...4...12..4~6......7...5...2...10~12....7...8...6...13~158...8...1...22~24....8...6...9...1~3......8...10..3...4~6......8...11..4...7~9......8...12..5...13~15....8...7...2...16~18Sitter.stay/switch...NS.to.6NS............Sitter.stay/switch...Sitter.stay/switch...Sitter.stay/switch...NS.to.1Mover.to.2EW.........EW.to.3..............Mover.to.4...........Mover.to.5...........Mover.to.6EW.........EW.to.2NS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zenbiddist Posted January 28, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2016 Here's the one from EBUScore: 6.Tables:.Double.Hesitation.Mitchell,.(Pair.13.=.Pair.2)Table.1..............Table.2..............Table.3..............Table.4..............Table.5..............Table.6Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set......Rd..NS..EW..Set1...1...7...1~3......1...2...8...4~6......1...3...9...7~9......1...4...10..10~12....1...5...11..16~18....1...6...12..19~212...1...6...4~6......2...12..7...7~9......2...3...8...10~12....2...4...9...13~15....2...5...10..19~21....2...2...11..22~243...1...2...7~9......3...11..6...10~12....3...3...7...13~15....3...4...8...16~18....3...5...9...22~24....3...12..10..1~34...1...12..10~12....4...10..2...13~15....4...3...6...16~18....4...4...7...19~21....4...5...8...1~3......4...11..9...4~65...1...11..13~15....5...9...12..16~18....5...3...2...19~21....5...4...6...22~24....5...5...7...4~6......5...10..8...7~96...1...10..16~18....6...8...11..19~21....6...3...12..22~24....6...4...2...1~3......6...5...6...7~9......6...9...7...10~127...1...9...19~21....7...7...10..22~24....7...3...11..1~3......7...4...12..4~6......7...5...2...10~12....7...8...6...13~158...8...1...22~24....8...6...9...1~3......8...10..3...4~6......8...11..4...7~9......8...12..5...13~15....8...7...2...16~18Sitter.stay/switch...NS.to.6NS............Sitter.stay/switch...Sitter.stay/switch...Sitter.stay/switch...NS.to.1Mover.to.2EW.........EW.to.3..............Mover.to.4...........Mover.to.5...........Mover.to.6EW.........EW.to.2NS Thanks, but I didn't think it was necessary to have pairs moving weirdly half-way across the movement, I thought you could run it like a normal Mitchell, but EW pairs pivot at two tables? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordontd Posted January 28, 2016 Report Share Posted January 28, 2016 Thanks, but I didn't think it was necessary to have pairs moving weirdly half-way across the movement, I thought you could run it like a normal Mitchell, but EW pairs pivot at two tables?No :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted January 28, 2016 Report Share Posted January 28, 2016 I've moved this thread to the Offline Bridge forum. It's not related to BBO tournaments, as we don't allow TDs to customize the movement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zenbiddist Posted January 29, 2016 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2016 Perhaps I didn't phrase that clearly - is there a double hesitation where the moving pairs move one table or acis per round (ie: without bouncing around the room as in the movement above)? Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gordontd Posted January 29, 2016 Report Share Posted January 29, 2016 Perhaps I didn't phrase that clearly - is there a double hesitation where the moving pairs move one table or acis per round (ie: without bouncing around the room as in the movement above)? CheersI think my answer still applies :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickRW Posted January 29, 2016 Report Share Posted January 29, 2016 Perhaps I didn't phrase that clearly - is there a double hesitation where the moving pairs move one table or acis per round (ie: without bouncing around the room as in the movement above)? Cheers A double hesitation Mitchell has "bouncing around the room" as you put it at two tables. By convention this is typically the last table and table 2. The circulation order of pairs is (for a 7 table 9 round movement) EW1 -> EW2 and so on to EW7 -> NS2 -> NS7 then re-joining the normal flow at EW1. There is such a thing as a single hesitation Mitchell that just goes EW1 -> EW2 and so on to EW7 -> NS7 then re-joining the normal flow at EW1. For 7 tables it plays for 8 rounds. For 6 tables it plays for 7 rounds, which means 21 or 28 boards. The latter is probably acceptable for a 27 board club. For a club that likes to play 24 boards, possibly neither is acceptable. (Instead use the share and relay (British speak, I think in the USA it is known as Relay and Byestand?) Mitchell [6 rounds of 4] or the full Howell [11 rounds of 2]. Alternatively put up with 2 "bouncing" tables for 8 rounds of 3) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oof Arted Posted February 12, 2016 Report Share Posted February 12, 2016 :rolleyes: Perhaps an easier way is to ask "Jim" :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.