mgoetze Posted December 28, 2015 Report Share Posted December 28, 2015 The National Teams Congress is approaching, to get everyone in the right mood, here's a BAM problem: [hv=pc=n&n=sq95hqt5da8642cat&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=1c(Clubs or Bal)2s3d(5+ hearts INV+)4spp5dp?]133|200[/hv] Do you want the better fit or do you want 30 per trick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted December 28, 2015 Report Share Posted December 28, 2015 When I saw the title, I wondered how you'd perpetrated 3N-9 :) What would 4N by partner have meant ? Is 5♦ likely to be 5-5 ? If so a lot of the time you can make 5♥ you can make 6♦ (x, AKJxx, KQxxx, xx for example) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 28, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2015 What would 4N by partner have meant ? Is 5♦ likely to be 5-5 ?Haven't discussed those questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted December 28, 2015 Report Share Posted December 28, 2015 agree 6d. It seems I have extras at this point of the bidding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gszes Posted December 28, 2015 Report Share Posted December 28, 2015 while we have no idea if p is sacrificing or bidding to make, we do know p began with inv+. This greatly increases the chance p is bidding to make and p had to be somewhat cautious because we have never had the opportunity to define our hand (ie the hand could be a misfit). Our hand is so pluperfectly? perfect I would actually bid 6c (cant be misunderstood since with a self sufficient club suit I could have bid 5c over 4s) in an attempt to reach a grand slam. It is BAM so the risk factor is minimal and if p 5d bid makes much sense 6d should be simple and 7d very close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomSac Posted December 28, 2015 Report Share Posted December 28, 2015 Partner is doubling most of the time with 5-5 and a good hand I think esp at this vul (eg x AKxxx KQxxx xx given earlier seems like a double?). It seems like he will often be 6-5. It's a very weird problem but the options are 6D or pass, not 5H or pass. Normally with 0553 partner would bid 4N if they didn't have enough defense to X, but I think with nebulous club that doesn't really work. Not sure what I'd do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nige1 Posted December 29, 2015 Report Share Posted December 29, 2015 [hv=pc=n&n=sq95hqt5da8642cat&d=n&v=e&b=9&a=1c(Clubs or Bal)2s3d(5+ hearts INV+)4spp5dp?]133|200|The National Teams Congress is approaching, to get everyone in the right mood, here's a BAM problem:Do you want the better fit or do you want 30 per trick?[/hv] I rank6♦ = Hoping that partner has at least ♠ x ♥ A K x x x ♦ K J x x x ♣ x x.5♥ = In case partner has ♠ x ♥ K J x x x ♦ K Q J x x ♣ K x.Pass . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted December 29, 2015 Report Share Posted December 29, 2015 I rank6♦ = Hoping that partner has at least ♠ x ♥ A K x x x ♦ K J x x x ♣ x x.5♥ = In case partner has ♠ x ♥ K J x x x ♦ K Q J x x ♣ K x.Pass . I don't fancy 5♥ that much on 2 for a couple of reasons. 1: potential diamond ruff2: 2 rounds of spades and you may lose control if hearts are 4-1. If hearts are 4-1 and they find the ruff, 5♦ may go off too, but the singleton diamond lead with the other hand having A♥ looks far from improbable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2015 Normally with 0553 partner would bid 4N if they didn't have enough defense to X, but I think with nebulous club that doesn't really work.Right, our general philosophy is to bid on the assumption that partner opened a weak NT, so the prototypical shape for 4NT would probably be 0544. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2015 I don't fancy 5♥ that much on 2 for a couple of reasons. 1: potential diamond ruff2: 2 rounds of spades and you may lose control if hearts are 4-1. If hearts are 4-1 and they find the ruff, 5♦ may go off too, but the singleton diamond lead with the other hand having A♥ looks far from improbable.Aren't these the sorts of considerations that should easily convince you at IMPs but must be weighed very carefully at BAM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted December 29, 2015 Report Share Posted December 29, 2015 Aren't these the sorts of considerations that should easily convince you at IMPs but must be weighed very carefully at BAM? I feel the number of hands where 5♥ is better than 50:50 and 6♦ doesn't make is pretty small, so you're aiming at a very small target, although 5♥ in practice will make more often than its theoretical odds. Whether you should play 5♦ or 6♦ on the other hand is not so clear, I'd probably try 6 depending on what I knew about partner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 29, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 29, 2015 I'd probably try 6 depending on what I knew about partner.I had the South hand, so you can go ahead and read my 4600+ posts on this forum if you need to know more. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted December 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 So my actual hand as South was - KJxxx QJxxx Kxx. With the singleton ♦K onside and hearts 3-2, 12 tricks were available in either red suit. But it seems noone is getting to 6♥. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyberyeti Posted December 30, 2015 Report Share Posted December 30, 2015 So my actual hand as South was - KJxxx QJxxx Kxx. With the singleton ♦K onside and hearts 3-2, 12 tricks were available in either red suit. But it seems noone is getting to 6♥. A♥ with the K♦ I presume, otherwise you can't make 6♥. Looks like 6♦ scores well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts