Jump to content

Match Recap


Recommended Posts

I have been looking at the hands from yesterday's match. One thing that I found very interesting is that the 2 bids used by Paul and Sartaj were quite effective. I would actually not have thought this to be the case and have always played other "more interesting" 2 bids.

 

For the record, they play

2D = Weak 2 in H or S, 6 card suit. Can be undisciplined. 6-9

 

2H/S = weak 2, 5 card suit. 7-10 HCP. Often 2 suited, even 5/5. Can be 5332 if 9-10

 

I personally thought it was redundant having 2 types of weak 2. Open 2 and make them guess. The rationale behind the above is based on lott.

Of course having 2 types of weak 2s means something else loses out

Wonder what others think about this?

 

Ron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I completely agree that you cannot treat a five-carder without another five-card suit as a six-carder. One looks nearly like a psychic, while the other begs for a raise.

 

I believe that most systems use 2C and 2D for hands which do not occur often enough (cases in point: the six-card 2C Moscito opening, the Precision 2D, the Flannery 2D, the awful French strong-but-not-a-game-force 2C, also the Majeure d'Abord 2C and 2D, which not only are strong but deny four spades - as they should since 1C shows four spades in that system and is forcing).

 

But while I am always amazed when I read the World Championshio books by the number of five-and-five two-suiters which are not opened, particularly by the Open teams, I feel strongly that a five-and-five is kind of a bona fide preempt, and that opening it with a Muiderberg or an Ekren is insufficient.

 

In other terms, if I were to play Paul Marston's two-bids, I would open these hands 2D and not 2H or 2S.

 

Which is why I have touted in another thread - "two possibilities or seven possibilities" - a constructive weak 2C opening which may be either a six-card major or a five-card major with another five-card suit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Ron

 

The 2-level openings are described in the book I know you are familiar to: "The Polish Club" by Greg Matula, page 171-173.

 

Acc. to this book those openings was introduced due to the ban of Wilkosz convention.

 

Those openings are the ones which are used in Polish Club - Balicki/Zmudzinski and in lighter strength by Kwiecien/Pszczola too. Those openings are repeated in their defenses as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marston advocates an extremely undisciplined 2M opening with hands ranging from a 5532 10 count to extremely weak 5-5 hand patterns. This opening is extremely different from the Polish style 2M openings that Claus has referenced. [The Polish 2M openings always promise 5-5 shape]

 

There were a number of 2M openings during the MOSCITO match.

 

Sartaj opened 2S holding

 

KQJ32

732

4

JT86

 

Sartaj opened 2S holding

 

AJT73

J95

95

KJ2

 

Note that I have never been a big fan of this opening. [i positively loath 5332 hands]. However, these openings worked well on Friday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...