Jump to content

opening


olegru

Pass - Pass - ?  

39 members have voted

  1. 1. Pass - Pass - ?

    • pass
      24
    • 1 [HE]
      4
    • 1 [SP]
      2
    • 2 [HE]
      9
    • something else
      0


Recommended Posts

I vote pass. I know it's great to open light in 3rd seat, but I don't really want a heart lead and a spade opening (playing 5 card majors) might lead to partner bouncing us to high in the auction. I'm happy if they bid to a major suit game and if they go into 3NT, partner is likely to lead a major anyway. Why stick my neck on the chopping block?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass... what is the problem?

 

If you feel like you have to open 2H/3H/1S on this hand to create action, maybe you should spend some time learning how to play the cards better. A 2H/1S/3H opening bid here is surely likely to create a swing, but one you can no longer control due to you superior card play, nor due to application of skilled bidding inference to side rather or not to compete later. Rather, you will win (or lose) based upon the joker you threw into the auction with the bid.

 

Now if it is late in a team game and you are behind, ok, you need a swing. A flattish hand will not help, by all means, try to create one. Or if this is last hand of a matchpoint thing and you need one more board to win or place very high? At least you have a reasonable expectation of creating a swing with some unusual activity here. But as for run of the mill bridge? Just do the normal thing here.

 

I don't mind opening 2H with 6H and 4S, especially in third chair. IF the major honors were reversed (AQ of hearts, Jack of spades), ok 2h would be fine.

 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd open 1 here. I'm concerned that opponents may be about to pass this hand out, and despite my lack of points it's probably our hand (fit in the majors) if this is the case. If we end up defending notrump, I really do want a heart lead -- even though my suit is poor it's an eventual source of tricks with the spades as entries. I definitely don't want partner to lead the unbid minor. The opening bid also sometimes misleads opponents about the location of values (especially the heart values) and might cause them to mis-evaluate their hands.

 

Of course, I'd never consider bidding on this hand in first or second chair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually this hand has some sad story. Probably for another discussion - that one (http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?showtopic=6806).

It was one of the last boards and I was really need a good score to win a tournament.

I openned 1. Not everyones choice, but, as we can see from this poll, I am not just one who chose it.

If Partner has support my hand much better than it looks now, if he has good spades - too. If Partner doesn't have majors, he, probably, will not jump too high.

Bidding follows:

dbl - 1NT - 4 - pass - pass - dbl.

Third best contract (my Partner had Kx spades), unlucky distribution, very average declarer play - down 3. 800.

Top? - Not!

Ave- assigned by director, who explained me, I must pass with 7 points or less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd open 1 here. I'm concerned that opponents may be about to pass this hand out

I don't think you should be seriously worried about that. You have a 7 count, and 2 players already passed. Well, the remaining hcp could be divided 11, 11, 11, but that is not even good enough.

 

LHO must also be balanced if he is to pass.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ave- assigned by director, who explained me, I must pass with 7 points or less.

Unless it was clearly stated on the table note, we have another example of an incompetent TD.

 

"I must pass with 7 points or less".

 

This is not even a psyche. A light opening perhaps, but a psyche? Far from it!

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually this hand has some sad story. Probably for another discussion - that one (http://forums.bridgebase.com/index.php?showtopic=6806).

It was one of the last boards and I was really need a good score to win a tournament.

I openned 1. Not everyones choice, but, as we can see from this poll, I am not just one who chose it.

If Partner has support my hand much better than it looks now, if he has good spades - too. If Partner doesn't have majors, he, probably, will not jump too high.

Bidding follows:

dbl - 1NT - 4 - pass - pass - dbl.

Third best contract (my Partner had Kx spades), unlucky distribution, very average declarer play - down 3. 800.

Top? - Not!

Ave- assigned by director, who explained me, I must pass with 7 points or less.

This is a ridiculous decision!

 

Your opponents were somehow damaged because you had a weaker hand than you promised.

 

If you had had a few more points and they had gone a further one down it would have been OK I suppose!

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

isn't there an acbl rule that says you have to have 8+ hcp to open 1 of a suit? maybe i'm thinking of something else... anyway, i'd pass this had

The WBF definition of a HUM includes the agreement that an opening of one in a suit may be based on "A king less than average strength". Points schmoints, this is an acceptable opening.

 

Of course, when playing with a pick-up partner it can't be a problem anyway. But this is probably all irrelevant since the tournament rules rarely prohibit HUMs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ave- assigned by director, who explained me, I must pass with 7 points or less.

 

It is likely that it was a BBOITALY tourney then.

 

In the BBOITALY tourneys they apply the rule enforced in Italy, where you cannot open at the 1-level with <8 hcp, not even as a psyche.

 

DISCLAIMER: I do not agree with this rule, just quoting so that you know where you will (or won't) be playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:)

 

Playing opposite myself, I would bid 2H because it should be (almost) safe even vul because of my 6-4 distribution and the trick taking potential in the spade suit. What to bid here is a matter of one's philosophy concerning weak 2 bids - are they essentially disciplined and constructive or preemptive and disruptive (my preference).

 

Best case is that pard can make a LAW raise with three or four hearts, and one of the opponents will intervene by bidding his/her partner's non-existent spade length. If partner might suspect that I could have a 5 bagger for my vul two bid, then bidding 2H is less attractive since a disruptive heart raise is less likely. This hand is a poster child for the 'preemptive and disruptive' school of weak two bids.

 

Trixie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...