Jump to content

What a stopper!


cherdano

1 Spade to you  

40 members have voted

  1. 1. 1 Spade to you

    • Pass
      2
    • Double
      34
    • 1NT
      4
    • 2 Clubs
      0
    • Other
      0


Recommended Posts

I voted for 1nt, there can only be 10or 11 points out there so odds are if your p has them all you get into 3nt if not they play 2 or 3 spades, I think x is wrong because you cant bid a suit after it ( well 4!C is not ny idea of a good suit) and if you x then bif NT (I think, but I am not sure it guarentees a spade stopper)

 

waiting to be shot down in flames, but an opinion is an opinion LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The is no ideal bid available, so you must choose 1 of the following 3.

 

1. 1NT. Shows the range and a spade stopper. The latter is a lie. If NT is where we belong, the contract is wrong-sided.

 

2. PASS and hope partner can reopen if LHO passes too. Partner will do his utmost to keep the auction alive with as little as 8 hcp. If he passes, it is not entirely impossible that defending is right. If LHO bids, it is often a wise move to stay out of this completely.

 

3. DOUBLE. Not the ideal shape, but compensating values.

 

I would double and pass any suit partner bids at the 2-level. I will raise 1NT to 2NT. I believe that it's right to come in now, and double is the least of evils in my opinion.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I play Raptor 1NT overcalls, so 1NT here is not an option for me. Therefore I would double because I play Raptor. However, even if my 1NT was balanced 16-18 or 15-17, or 16-19, or similar ranges, I would still double.

 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bid 1NT. I don't give a damn about stoppers. Never have, never will. Who says we'll be playing NT anyway?

 

Besides, if pard is so worried about the stopper, he can ask if I have one or not with a 2H "transfer":

 

1S 1NT pass 2H

pass ..?

 

2S = 1/2 stopper (Qx, Jxx, Txx, xxxx)

2NT = full stopper, min

3x = no stopper (xxx, xx)

3S = 2 stoppers if you like

3NT = full stopper max

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bid 1NT. I don't give a damn about stoppers. Never have, never will. Who says we'll be playing NT anyway?

 

Besides, if pard is so worried about the stopper, he can ask if I have one or not with a 2H "transfer":

 

1S 1NT pass 2H

pass ..?

 

2S = 1/2 stopper (Qx, Jxx, Txx, xxxx)

2NT = full stopper, min

3x = no stopper (xxx, xx)

3S = 2 stoppers if you like

3NT = full stopper max

Realize almost all play transfers here but maybe we should not.

Having strong hand on lead can often make the difference on a hand.

 

 

So 1nt=2h could be to play and start all invite hands with 2clubs?

This puts nt bidder back as declarer with 4 hearts and invite but otherwise we can play hand with lead up to us with weak and h or D or clubs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i tend to agree with whereagles re: stoppers, but that really isn't the issue on this hand/bidding... if there is a stopper, supposing we play nt, partner has it... i want the lead coming to him rather than going thru him, so i'd double
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double.

 

No second choice, the bad shape is compensated

by the points.

It seems, that People who will bid 1 NT, tend to

play against opponents, who will not lead spade,

because "they promised a stopper". And of course,

they wont alert the 1 NT bid, because it's natural ....

 

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double.

 

No second choice, the bad shape is compensated

by the points.

It seems, that People who will bid 1 NT, tend to

play against opponents, who will not lead spade,

because "they promised a stopper".  And of course,

they wont alert the 1 NT bid, because it's natural ....

 

Marlowe

Since when does one have to alert if their bid does not show a stopper? What if two suits are bid? Do I have to have a stopper in both or else my bid should be alerted? It might not be sound bridge, but I hardly believe it says anywhere in the laws that a NT bid must contain a stopper of a bid suit, lest it be alerted.

 

I choose double by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can remember a hand very similar to these being posted on an expert panel.

 

The hand was instead 10xx/AQ/KQJx/AJxx, wich is way different since there you will have a real unsolvable problem after partner answers 2.

Still the consensous was to double (my 1NT scored less points than those bidding 2, only above 2NT, grrrr).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Double.

 

No second choice, the bad shape is compensated

by the points.

It seems, that People who will bid 1 NT, tend to

play against opponents, who will not lead spade,

because "they promised a stopper".  And of course,

they wont alert the 1 NT bid, because it's natural ....

 

Marlowe

Since when does one have to alert if their bid does not show a stopper? What if two suits are bid? Do I have to have a stopper in both or else my bid should be alerted? It might not be sound bridge, but I hardly believe it says anywhere in the laws that a NT bid must contain a stopper of a bid suit, lest it be alerted.

 

I choose double by the way.

Simply put: A natural NT promises a stopper, at least

this is the standard treatment and anything else would

probably be rated as "highly" ususual around the whole

world, and your opponents need to be informed, if you

play something, they cannot reasonable expect

You have to be careful with statements like "around the

whole world", but I think, in this case I am on fairly

safe ground.

I would always alert it, unless I am 100% sure, that the

alerting rules actualy forbid this. Are you 100% sure they

forbid these special alert? Would you doubt, that the natural

1 NT overcall did not promise a stopper?

If it does, but there is no one, then this is ok, because I

would regards this as a bluff / psych bid, I have no problems

with psych bid, but with fielding psych bids.

 

The overcall is natural in the sense, that it describes a

strong (?!) NT type hand, but natural and artificial has

nothing to do with alert or non alert.

 

And I am not talking about the follwing case, natural system,

 

1C - (1S) - 1 NT

...

 

were the 1 NT bid may or may not promise a stopper,

but then the 1 NT bid is not natural, it just is a bid saying,

I have ... HCP and no support.

 

and also not about the case were one overcalls 1 NT with

stopper and a balanced 12-14 count, a treatment, probably

no sane person would play.

 

This both cases are a gray areas reagrading alerting.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simply put: A natural NT promises a stopper, at least

this is the standard treatment and anything else would

probably be rated as "highly" ususual around the whole

world, and your opponents need to be informed, if you

play something, they cannot reasonable expect.

i disagree with this... the 1nt bid should show a certain range... if the opps asked me whether or not it shows a stopper i'd say "it does not have to".. i've never heard anyone say that such a method requires an alert, tho i may be wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...