kb49 Posted October 31, 2015 Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 EBU In a teams of four match a board is played and scored in the first half. 3NT by S making plus one Vul. Score 630. In the second half that board could not be played. Not the players fault. How is it now scored considering it had already been played once. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMB1 Posted October 31, 2015 Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 In a teams of four match a board is played and scored in the first half. 3NT by S making plus one Vul. Score 630. In the second half that board could not be played. Not the players fault. How is it now scored considering it had already been played once.Multiple teams: AVE+ to both sides, +3 IMP to both teams; Law 12C2Knockout teams: flat; EBU White Book, 8.90.3(e) (In principal Law 86D could apply.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pran Posted October 31, 2015 Report Share Posted October 31, 2015 EBUIn a teams of four match a board is played and scored in the first half. 3NT by S making plus one Vul. Score 630. In the second half that board could not be played. Not the players fault. How is it now scored considering it had already been played once.Unless you have specific regulations for the situation (and I don't know the EBU regulations) the board is cancelled and an artificial score is assigned on this board to each team, both of which in no way at fault. See Law 12C2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.