Jump to content

Who is wrong here?


Recommended Posts

[hv=pc=n&s=skq76h7dkq93ca876&n=s8haq9863d7ckqjt9&d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1hp1sp2cp3np4hppp]266|200[/hv]

 

North thinks South should have bid 2 4th suit game forcing after the 2 bid

 

and South thinks North should have bid 2 to show 6 hearts and north should pass 3NT no matter which way it is bid

 

Who is WRONG?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

North certainly shouldn't bid 2 but probably 4 is a better call than 4.

 

I don't feel strongly about whether S should bid FSF or 3NT but it is good to have this discussion. Agree whether 3NT shows heart tolerance or not, and then both partners stick to their agreement in the future.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both are wrong! But S more :)

 

S (esp. at IMPs) could probe a bit more before committing to 3NT. At matchpoints the bid comes more easily. So N is somehow not too wrong.

 

But S shouldn't blame N for the 2C bid. N was right to bid 2C (but should pull out 3NT to 4C, not 4H). And there is no such thing as a "SYM" 3NT (shut your mouth): N can pull out with undisclosed shape or strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my opinions in auction order:

 

1 is obvious. 2 or 2 instead would be just plain wrong.

2 is obvious. Arguing for 2 is silly.

3NT is fine; using 2-fsf tends to suggest five spades, seeking a 5-3 fit.

Arguing that 3NT bars partner is also silly.

North should bid 4 instead of 4.

South should bid 5 instead of his final pass.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suggest

1 - 2

3 - 4 (minorwood)

4N - 5

 

I'd almost always choose 2/1 over 1 with GF values. The suit will not get lost.

Of the two minors I'll steer toward even with an inferior suit because it allows more room. Partner will rebid with 4 in most cases.

The splinter 3 takes less space too - you might choose 3 as the splinter to relieve partner of any distraction if they hold a 4-card suit.

Minorwood (or Redwood) reveals 2 with Q. Stopping in 5 seems straight forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my opinions in auction order:

 

1 is obvious. 2 or 2 instead would be just plain wrong.

2 is obvious. Arguing for 2 is silly.

3NT is fine; using 2-fsf tends to suggest five spades, seeking a 5-3 fit.

Arguing that 3NT bars partner is also silly.

North should bid 4 instead of 4.

South should bid 5 instead of his final pass.

 

100% agree with every point above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&s=skq76h7dkq93ca876&n=s8haq9863d7ckqjt9&d=n&v=0&b=1&a=1hp1sp2cp3np4hppp]266|200[/hv]

 

North thinks South should have bid 2 4th suit game forcing after the 2 bid

 

and South thinks North should have bid 2 to show 6 hearts and north should pass 3NT no matter which way it is bid

 

Who is WRONG?

 

both, as usual. 1st mistake was using 2/1. 2nd mistake was 1 s. after immediate 2 c response, even 2/1 players will often get to right contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...