Jump to content

Passing a forcing bid


Hanoi5

Recommended Posts

By an unpassed hand, East's bid would be forcing. But normally, after a pass, East's bid would be encouraging but not forcing. It would seem partner's hand would have at least 5 and about 10-11 points.

 

Something to consider is what partner has not bid. Since partner failed to open, obviously partner doesn't have a 1 opener. But partner also didn't make a weak 2 bid. Depending on how disciplined partner opens weak 2s in 1st seat, that can tell you a lot. It would seem likely that partner has only 5 . If partner does have 6, then there is some other flaw that precludes a weak 2.

 

Another thing to consider is how partner will interpret a raise. If partner will carry on to game with a good 10 then raising may get you too high. If you have some mechanism to distinguish a competitive raise from an invitational one, then raising to the LTT level would be good matchpoint tactics.

 

Finally, look at your hand. You have a very minimum flat opener. I like to work out a somewhat basic LTC, not so much to apply it literally, but as a gauge on how good the hand is. It looks like about 8 1/2 losers versus a typical 7 losers for most openers. So that seems to indicate that given a choice it might be better to be a tad pessimistic versus making an aggressive call.

 

So, I'd consider passing here and raising to 3 if the opponents compete further in .

 

If you have the agreement that 2 in this auction is indeed forcing, then you have tougher decision. Passing violates partnership agreements, but raising can be a problem, too. If your partner would get upset by your passing, then I'd raise and maybe discuss how to handle hands like this one after the session. If partner is more accepting of your judgment, then especially at matchpoints, I don't see a problem passing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=pc=n&w=sa84hq965da64cqt8&d=e&v=0&b=14&a=pp1c1s2hp?]133|200|

Hanoi5 poses this MP problem.

I rank

1. Pass. Although you may regret this if LHO can compete further at this low level.

2. 2N. An MP gamble

3. 3. Might still invite unwelcome competition.

[/hv]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2H is not forcing. Encouraging probably but NF nevertheless coming from a passed hand. I'll go with the Law and bid 3H. No easy balance for N!

2 is 100% non-forcing. With dead minimum 12 pts and worst possible 4333 distribution am inclined to pass, but wouldn't complain if roles reversed and my partner raised with this hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first thing to realize is that there are very few bids by a passed hand that are forcing and the 2h bid is not one of them. The 2h bid is probably similar to an sayc 2/1 but near minimum due to the original failure to open. At IMPs this is a pretty easy 3h raise but it becomes just a tad more complicated at MP where stretching for thin games is against the odds.

Our hand is minimum by pretty much any standard of measure and while our 4th heart gives us a fair amount of protection at the 3 level we would seem to be a fair distance away from

4h opposite the vast majority of passed hands. We can always back in later if needed with 3h but for now I prefer

 

pass = 9

3h = 7

 

I never considered gambling with 2n (nige1) but that might merely be because of taking too may trips to Las Vegas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...