patroclo Posted September 2, 2015 Report Share Posted September 2, 2015 Sometimes an opp claims all the tricks while these are all of the declarer. I think that also the dummy have to accept not only the declarer. Because 2 players control the claim better than 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgoetze Posted September 2, 2015 Report Share Posted September 2, 2015 So now all of us bridge players have to wait for dummy to come back from his cigarette break just because some small minority is playing a different game where declarer never thinks about how many tricks he can take? No thanks. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fourdad Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 silly idea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 declarer can always ask "hey dummy, can you see if the claim is right?" if he is unsure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patroclo Posted September 3, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 I am speaking on bbo game.It happened that an opp claimed instead than concede all the tricks during a slam. Declarer accepted, but after there wasn't any way to correct the mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nekthen Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 I think that defenders should not claim. Maybe the software should only allow claims by declarer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamJson Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 Claiming is ok, but only if you are certain. I have seen claims which were refused, because a defender still had a trump or two. In some cases I suspect that declarer had miscounted and may have gone down if he had not been reminded by the refusal. Actually I think the rules state that declarer cannot draw trumps following a claim unless he specifies this when claiming, which on BBO you can't. Defenders should also be careful when claiming or conceding. A partner once conceded all the remaining tricks in a high level contract. Declarer swiftly accepted before I could point out that I had the outstanding trump, not declarer, as partner had assumed from the bidding, and a running suit. So partner's concession turned minus 4 to plus one (or something like that). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 The Laws of Duplicate Bridge say that dummy is allowed to contest a claim. But our claim procedure is actually much more like rubber bridge (when a claim is disputed, we play the hand out with the claimant's hand exposed, instead of having a TD adjudicate). In rubber bridge, only declarer is allowed to dispute a defender's claim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SelfGovern Posted September 3, 2015 Report Share Posted September 3, 2015 <snippage> Actually I think the rules state that declarer cannot draw trumps following a claim unless he specifies this when claiming, which on BBO you can't.<snippage>In fact, there is a text box included when you push the claim button. So declarer (or defender) could easily enter something like "Drawing trump" or "3!h, 2!C, 1!S" or "You get 2 diamonds at the end". I recommend using this to clarify your claim, although most people here do not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.